Snell's law and optical filters.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around an experiment measuring light intensity through an optical filter designed for a wavelength of 405 nm, with an incident laser wavelength of 402 nm. The experiment revealed a peak intensity at a 10-degree angle of incidence, with a notable drop at 0 and 20 degrees. The user seeks to calculate the wavelength of light inside the filter at these angles using Snell's law, questioning if the difference between angles of incidence and refraction remains constant. Responses clarify that while the refractive index ratio remains constant, the angle of refraction will vary with the angle of incidence, and the wavelength inside the medium is determined by the medium's refractive index rather than the angle of incidence or intensity. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the refractive index to accurately calculate the wavelength within the filter.
Greger
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I recently did a experiment in which I measured the intensity of light out of a optical filter at different angles of incidence.

The optical filter was designed such that only light of wavelength 405 nm is transmitted. The wavelength of incident light (the laser I used) was 402 nm.

My first measurement was 0 degree's which meant the laser was perpendicular to the filter. I obtained an intensity peak at 10 degree's which had a width of around 10 degree's. So the intensity at 0 and 20 degrees was small.

Now I was asked to calculate the band-width. I think I can do this using Snell's rule.

\frac{sin(\theta_1)}{sin(\theta_2)} =\frac{\lambda_1}{\lambda_2}

I know that at 10 degree's the wavelength into the filter is 402 nm and the wavelength inside it 405 nm (since all of the light is transmitted) so I can calculate the angle of refraction (I get 10.075).

My question is, how can I calculate the wave length light inside the filter at angles 0 and 20 degrees (when the intensity drops)?

At first I was thinking that I could keep the angle of refraction constant, then just substitute the new angle of incidence in and calculate the wavelength inside, but I know that's not right (the angle of refraction wouldn't be constant).

I was wondering, would the difference between the angle of incidence and refraction be the same? Like for the incidence angle 10, the angle of refraction is 10.075 so the difference is 0.075. Would this be the same for the incidence angle 20? If so then it's possible to calculate the wavelength inside the medium with incidence angles 0 and 20, but if not, I'm not sure how else I could do it as I wouldn't know the angle of refraction.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for your reply,

I am required to determine the band width using the method I described in my first post.

The second article you posted does show similar results to what I have obtained, however I am asking how, from the information I currently have, can I calculate λ2. (Recall the information I have is the incident angle and wavelength, I am not sure about the angle of refraction)
 
I don't know if I am correct but:-
Greger said:
...I know that at 10 degree's the wavelength into the filter is 402 nm and the wavelength inside it 405 nm (since all of the light is transmitted) so I can calculate the angle of refraction (I get 10.075).
You can get the refractive index of the fibre by this and then and use it to calculate angle of refraction.
My question is, how can I calculate the wave length light inside the filter at angles 0 and 20 degrees (when the intensity drops)?
Wavelength of light depends only on the speed of light in the medium and shouldn't be affected by either angle of incidence or intensity.
I was wondering, would the difference between the angle of incidence and refraction be the same?
Nope, that doesn't make any sense to me. Their ratio on the other hand should be constant (refractive index).
Hope this helps.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top