Solar cells: How much they absorb, reflect and diffuse

AI Thread Summary
Gallium arsenide solar cells have varying absorption, reflection, and diffusion rates, with silicon cells achieving around 67% absorption. The efficiency of solar cells is influenced by factors such as incident angle, surface roughness, and geometry. Research indicates that nanoparticle surfaces may enhance efficiency further. Specialized tools and academic papers are available for in-depth exploration of these metrics. Understanding these variables is crucial for optimizing solar cell performance.
Deadstar
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
Hey folks not sure if this is the right section but I'll give it a go...

I'm trying to out find out what percentage of photons a solar cell (preferably gallium arsenide solar cells) will absorb, reflect and diffuse. I have read, from a few links, that the highest absorption rate for silicon solar cells we have now is around 67%, does this sound correct..? Does anyone have any good links with info on this. I can only find info on absorption rates (and even then only on silicon ones) and not diffusion or reflection though and would like to know stats for these as well. These numbers will obviously depend on incident angle so if any links mention that it would be great.


http://solar.calfinder.com/blog/solar-information/solar-cell-absorption-rates-reaching-near-perfect/
http://www.wattwatt.com/pulses/340/solar-cell-absorption-rates-whats-the-big-deal/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top