Solution to Laplace Equation across Boundaries

Apteronotus
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I read somewhere that solutions to Laplace's Equation must agree at a shared boundary.
So for example if \Phi_{1} and \Phi_{2} are two solutions to the Laplace equation in two different regions which share a boundary, then on the boundary \Phi_{1} = \Phi_{2}
Is this true?
Can you help me see why?

Thanks in advance,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Apteronotus said:
Hi everyone,

I read somewhere that solutions to Laplace's Equation must agree at a shared boundary.
So for example if \Phi_{1} and \Phi_{2} are two solutions to the Laplace equation in two different regions which share a boundary, then on the boundary \Phi_{1} = \Phi_{2}
Is this true?
Can you help me see why?

Thanks in advance,
In order that a function satisfy Laplace's equation, it must be differentiable. Otherewise the derivatives don't make sense! In particular, that means it must be continuous.
 
Though I don't disagree with your statement HallsofIvy, it wouldn't necessarily apply in this situation. One function \Phi_{1}is continuous in region 1 and the other \Phi_{2}is continuous in region 2, where region 1 and 2 only share a boundary. <br /> <br /> Would it be true that these two <b>different</b> functions have the same value on this boundary, given that they both satisfy the Laplace equation?
 
Apteronotus said:
Hi everyone,
I read somewhere that solutions to Laplace's Equation must agree at a shared boundary. then on the boundary \Phi_{1} = \Phi_{2}.

If this true? Let f : S1->R = 37. Let g: S2->R = 92. Both f and g satisfy Laplace's equation on S1 and S2 respectively. Suppose S1 = {(x,y) | x^2 + y^2 <= 2}, and S2={(x,y) | 1< x^2 + y^2 <= 2}.
S1 and S2 share a boundary, namely x^2 + y^2 = 2, but f and g are different functions on this boundary.
 
No, there is NO requirement that solutions of Laplace's equations in different regions (with shared boundary) coincide on the boundary. Rather, Laplace's equation itself makes no requirement. Within a region, a solution must be differentiable, but at the boundaries, it is usually not, and can even be discontinuous.

The question as to whether two adjoining solutions must be "stitched together" in a continuous way depends entirely on the physical problem at hand. In electromagnetism, for example, the electric potential must be continuous in most cases; therefore, we must choose Laplace solutions that match up on the boundaries. Even so, the potential will usually NOT be differentiable at the boundaries (consider the potential of a conducting shell, which is constant inside, but falls as 1/r outside).

There are some cases, however, in which the potential is also discontinuous: e.g., a dipole layer. A dipole layer is a surface which is considered to have a certain dipole moment per unit area (perpendicular to the surface). Across a dipole layer, the potential makes a discontinuous jump in proportion to the local dipole moment.
 
Thank you kindly for your replies.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top