Solve 3D TISE in Potential Well: Eigenvals/Fns & Normalize

  • Thread starter Thread starter obnoxiousris
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3d
obnoxiousris
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle in a 3D cubical potential well. The walls are Lx, Ly, Lz long.
Inside the well, V(x,y,z)=0 when 0<x<Lx, 0<y<Ly, 0<z<Lz. V= ∞ elsewhere.
Solve the TISE to find the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of this potential. And to normalise the wavefunctions.

(Hint: look for separable solutions in the form ψ(x,y,z)=X(x)Y(y)Z(z))

Homework Equations



(-hbar/2m)(∇2)ψ(x,y,z)+V(x,y,z)ψ(x,y,z)=Eψ(x,y,z)

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm confused about which equation to use for this question. I know that for a potential well, the V terms are zero, and i can write -hbar/2m and E in terms of k, so the equation reduces to ∇2ψ(x,y,z)=-k2ψ(x,y,z).

we did the one dimensional well in class. my teacher used ψ(x)=Asin(kx)+Bsin(kx) as a general solution, then subbed in the boundary conditions like when x=L, ψ(x)=0 and so on.

However, I know that ψ(x)=Aeikx is also a general solution to the differential equation. And this is used for free particles. I did some research online, and apparently I can treat a particle in the well as a free particle.

So i don't know which equation i should use, and what are the differences between the two equations? Some sites I've seen used the trig, some used the complex.

I tried to use the complex one, I got (after normalisation) ψ(x,y,z)=(1/sqrt3L)ei(kxx+kyy+kzz). Then I tried to sub in the boundary conditions, only to realize no matter what i did i couldn't make ψ=0.
So I tried to use the trig, but the equation wasn't separable.

I really don't know what to do here, some help would be appreciated! Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two independent solutions, eikx and e-ikx. You will need both in order to satisfy your boundary conditions.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top