Solve Branch Rule Problem: Tips and Advice

  • Thread starter Thread starter FocusedWolf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Branch
FocusedWolf
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
How do you do this problem? I've seen other branch problems where you just give + sign for current entering and - leaving and the unknown is going to make it equal 0, but what do you do in this case?

http://focusedwolf.googlepages.com/branch.jpg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
FocusedWolf said:
How do you do this problem? I've seen other branch problems where you just give + sign for current entering and - leaving and the unknown is going to make it equal 0, but what do you do in this case?

http://focusedwolf.googlepages.com/branch.jpg
Are there arrows to go with all the numbers? I think you need directions on all of them.
 
no, infact that's a scan of a practice/old exam question...nothing like it in my physics book or homework :smile:
 
FocusedWolf said:
no, infact that's a scan of a practice/old exam question...nothing like it in my physics book or homework :smile:
I did not check the multiple choice answers. I suppose it is possible only one of them is a possible solution using all the different possible current directions. I think the maximum possible current would be with all inward currents (except the ammeter)

I = [10 + 4 + 4 + 5 + 8 - 3] = 28 A

and that is too much (28*60) = 1680

Any of the blue numbers could have the opposite sign. Changing the 4 to -4 gives 1200. I did not try the other possibilies.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top