Solve Change of Variables Int. on Triangular R [0,1]

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a double integral involving a continuous function over a triangular region defined by the vertices (0,0), (1,0), and (0,1). The original poster seeks to show the equivalence of two integrals through a change of variables, specifically using the substitutions u = x+y and v = y.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to justify the limits of integration after making the substitutions. They express uncertainty about the lower limit for u and seek clarification on the bounds derived from the boundaries of the triangular region.
  • Some participants provide insights into the inequalities that define the bounds for u and v, discussing the implications of the boundary lines on the transformed region.
  • Others suggest alternative methods to justify the lower limit for u, including visualizing the region and considering additional boundary lines.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different methods to establish the limits of integration. Several approaches have been proposed, and while no consensus has been reached, there is a productive exchange of ideas regarding the justification of the bounds.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework problem, which may limit the information available for establishing the bounds. The original poster has expressed uncertainty about the justification of certain limits, indicating potential gaps in their understanding of the transformation process.

Benny
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
Hi, I would like some help with the following question.

Q. Let f be continuous on [0,1] and let R be the triangular region with vertices (0,0), (1,0) and (0,1). Show that:

[tex] \int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_R^{} {f\left( {x + y} \right)} dA = \int\limits_0^1 {uf\left( u \right)} } du[/tex]


By making the substitutions u = x+y and v = y, I got it down to:

[tex] \int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_R^{} {f\left( {x + y} \right)} dA = } \int\limits_0^1 {\int\limits_0^u {f\left( u \right)} dvdu} [/tex]

The above leads to the given result. However, I was stuck on trying to get bounds for the integrals so I'm not sure if I've justified those limits of integration properly.

From the boundary line y = 1 - x, the substitution u = x+y gives u = 1. From the boundary line x = 0, the substitutions yield u = 0 + y = v so that v = u. The boundary line y = 0 yields v = 0. The lower limit for u is what I am lacking in. The three boundaries that I've just obtained completely describe the region R anyway so I decided to say that at the origin x,y = 0 which gives u = 0. I'm not sure whether I should've done something else to obtain the lower u limit.

Any help would be good.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If the original bounds are 0<=y<=1 and 0<=x<=1-y

then for u=x+y and v=y we have

0<=x<=1-y ==> y<=x+y<=1 ==> v<=u<=1

and, of chourse 0<=v<=1
 
A better way: (take all inequalities as inclusive)

Let L1: x+y=1, 0<y<1 ==> L1': u=1, 0<v<1
Let L2: y=0, 0<x<1 ==> L2': v=0, 0<u-v<1, but v=0, so 0<u-0<1 or just 0<u<1
Let L3: x=0, 0<y<1 ==> L3': u-v=0 i.e. u=v, 0<v<1
 
So the transformed region is /| = a right triangle in the uv-plane formed by cutting the unit square along u=v, lower triangle
 
Thanks for the help Benorin. I just thought of another way to justify setting u = 0 as a lower bound for the u integral. I've already established 3boundary lines which already account for the 'shape' of the original region in the xy plane. From a quick sketch I can see that adding the line y = - x as a boundary line still gives the same region so y = - x => y + x = 0 = u. But that's kind of a fudge method, your method is the right one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K