Solve Gaussian Integrals: QFT Explained & Math Book for Physicists

RedX
Messages
963
Reaction score
3
This is probably an easy question, but my math is not good enough to answer it.

For Gaussian integrals:

\frac{\int \Pi_i [dx_i] x_k x_l e^{-\frac{x_i A_{ij} x_j}{2}}} {\int \Pi_i [dx_i] e^{-\frac{x_i A_{ij} x_j}{2}}}=A^{-1}_{kl}

As far as I understand it, in QFT, Aij is a local operator. So Aij might be at most block diagonal, with very tiny sub-blocks corresponding to derivative terms (to know the derivative you only need to know the field an infinitismal distance away). Hence A-1ij should be block diagonal too, with tiny sub-blocks of the same dimension.

So how is it that the propagator G(x-y)=-iA^{-1}_{xy} doesn't seem to vanish for (x-y) not infinitismal?

Also does anyone know of a good math book written for improving the math of physics students?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


RedX said:
Hence A-1ij should be block diagonal too, with tiny sub-blocks of the same dimension.

I don't think this is true.
 


weejee said:
I don't think this is true.

Yeah. The matrix A was never block diagonal to begin with: I don't know what I was thinking there. Just because it has only nearest neighbors on the diagonals doesn't mean it's block diagonal. So I think in general the inverse is global.
 


Hassani has a text on mathematics for physicists that quite complete and fairly modern and well written.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top