Solve Heat Current Problem at Junction of Copper, Brass & Steel Rods

  • Thread starter Thread starter sdoug041
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Heat
sdoug041
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Rods of copper, brass, and steel are welded together to form a Y-shaped figure. The cross-sectional area of each rod is 2.00 cm^2. The free end of the copper rod is maintained at 100.0 degrees C, and the free ends of the brass and steel rods at 0.0 degrees C. Assume there is no heat loss from the surfaces of the rods. The lengths of the rods are: copper, 13.0 cm; brass, 18.0 cm; steel, 24.0 cm

What is the temperature at the junction?

Homework Equations



H = kA(T[hot]-T[cold]) / L

Where H is the heat current, k is the materials thermal conductivity, A is the cross-sectional area,
T[hot]-T[cold] / L is the temperature gradient. (change in temp divided by length).

The Attempt at a Solution



I can solve these types of questions with only 2 bars. What I would do is plug in the values for each material into the heat current formula , make them equal each other, then solve for T at the junction. This method won't work for 3 materials coming together. Please help! Thanks.[Edit] I'm sorry for posting this in the advanced physics thread it was supposed to be in introductory. If any mod sees this they can move it, thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you show where you're getting stuck? It looks like you're going to have four equations and four unknowns.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top