Solve Ideal Gas Law Problem: 1.2L Bottle of SO2 at 78PSI, 23°C

AI Thread Summary
To solve for the number of moles of sulfur dioxide in a 1.2 L bottle at 78 psi and 23°C, the pressure must be converted to atm, resulting in 63.3 atm. Using the Ideal Gas Law equation PV=nRT, where R is the constant 0.08206 atm·L/(mol·K), the calculation shows that n equals approximately 0.25662 moles. The user confirms they are on the right track and successfully identifies the value of R. The discussion concludes with the user expressing satisfaction in resolving the problem.
brandon1
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
In preparation for a demonstration, your professor brings a 1.2 L bottle of sulfur dioxide into the lecture hall before class to allow the gas to reach room temperature. If the pressure gauge reads 78 psi and the lecture hall is 23°C, how many moles of sulfur dioxide are in the bottle? (Hint: The gauge reads zero when 14.7 psi of gas remains.)

First, I got the P=63.3 and T=296K

PV=nRT
(63.3K)(1.2L)=296nR
75.96=296nR
.25662=nR

Now, how do I get R, or is a always the same value (if so, what is it!) Am I at least heading in the right direction? (Disregard significant figures at the moment)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
R is a constant. It is equaled to 0.08206 atm.l/(mol.K) .
 
Thank you, I got it!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top