Solve Scattering Problem: Find Wall Thickness for Half Incident Particles

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scattering
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a scattering problem to determine the wall thickness needed for half of the incident particles to pass through without scattering. The key equations involve calculating the number of scattered particles based on the target density and the cross-sectional area of the atoms. The participant initially calculates the target density but struggles to find the necessary values for density and atomic mass to proceed. A suggestion is made to use the macroscopic cross-section and an exponential decay formula to find the thickness where half the particles remain unscattered. The conversation emphasizes a different perspective on approaching the problem while seeking clarity on the calculations involved.
Anro
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A beam of particles strikes a wall containing 2 × 10^29 atoms/m^3. Each atom behaves as a hard sphere of radius 3 × 10^–15 m.

Find the thickness of the wall such that exactly half the incident particles go through without scattering.

Homework Equations



N(sc) = N(inc) × n(tar) × σ ---> (1)
N(sc) = the number of scattered particles
N(inc) = the number of incident particles
n(tar) = the target density
σ = cross sectional area of the target = πR^2
n(tar) = ρt/m ---> (2)
ρ = density
t = thickness of the wall
m = mass

The Attempt at a Solution



Hello everyone; this is a straightforward scattering problem but I seem to be missing something here. This is what I did so far:
From the given information I have:
N(sc) = ½ N(inc) ---> 2N(sc) = N(inc)
R = 3 × 10^–15 m ---> σ = πR^2 = 9π × 10^–30 m^2
Plugging these values in equation (1), I can get the value of n(tar) which turned out to be 1.77 × 10^28 m^–2
Having this value of n(tar), I can substitute into equation (2) and solve for t. This is where I’m stuck, as I’m supposed to find numerical values for ρ and m in order for me to find t. These values can be obtained from the given information that the wall contains 2 × 10^29 atoms/m^3, and I think that I can get my values for ρ and m from the following equation:
The number of atoms per unit volume = (Avogadro’s number × density)/atomic mass
That is: 2 × 10^29 atoms/m^3 = (6.022 × 10^23 mol^–1 × density)/atomic mass
This is where I’m not sure how to proceed, as I need to find the density and atomic mass (and convert it to kg as well) from this equation; any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Be careful here.

We know that the macroscopic cross-section, Σ, for an interaction is given by Σ = nσ, where n is the atomic density and σ is the microscopic cross section.

So Σs = nσs.

Now we also know that N(x) = No exp (-Σs x), where x is the distance traveled, and No is the initial particle intensity (we could use I(x) and Io).

All we need to do is find the distance (thickness) t at which half of the particles reach without scattering, and so they leave the other side (of slab thickness t), without having scattered.

So what is N(t)/No?
 
Now it makes sense using your equations; still straightforward, but different way of looking at things. Thank you very much for your help Astronuc, I really appreciate it.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top