Solve Scattering Problem: Find Wall Thickness for Half Incident Particles

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scattering
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a scattering problem involving a wall with a particle density of 2 × 1029 atoms/m3 and atoms modeled as hard spheres with a radius of 3 × 10–15 m. The goal is to determine the wall thickness required for half of the incident particles to pass through without scattering. Key equations include the scattering formula N(sc) = N(inc) × n(tar) × σ and the relationship between atomic density, density, and atomic mass. The solution involves calculating the macroscopic cross-section and applying the exponential attenuation law N(x) = N0 exp(–Σs x).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of scattering theory and cross-sections
  • Familiarity with the concepts of atomic density and hard sphere models
  • Knowledge of exponential decay functions in physics
  • Basic skills in algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the exponential attenuation law in particle physics
  • Learn about macroscopic and microscopic cross-sections in scattering problems
  • Research methods for calculating atomic density and its relation to density and atomic mass
  • Explore practical examples of scattering problems in nuclear and particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on particle physics, nuclear engineering, and materials science, will benefit from this discussion.

Anro
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A beam of particles strikes a wall containing 2 × 10^29 atoms/m^3. Each atom behaves as a hard sphere of radius 3 × 10^–15 m.

Find the thickness of the wall such that exactly half the incident particles go through without scattering.

Homework Equations



N(sc) = N(inc) × n(tar) × σ ---> (1)
N(sc) = the number of scattered particles
N(inc) = the number of incident particles
n(tar) = the target density
σ = cross sectional area of the target = πR^2
n(tar) = ρt/m ---> (2)
ρ = density
t = thickness of the wall
m = mass

The Attempt at a Solution



Hello everyone; this is a straightforward scattering problem but I seem to be missing something here. This is what I did so far:
From the given information I have:
N(sc) = ½ N(inc) ---> 2N(sc) = N(inc)
R = 3 × 10^–15 m ---> σ = πR^2 = 9π × 10^–30 m^2
Plugging these values in equation (1), I can get the value of n(tar) which turned out to be 1.77 × 10^28 m^–2
Having this value of n(tar), I can substitute into equation (2) and solve for t. This is where I’m stuck, as I’m supposed to find numerical values for ρ and m in order for me to find t. These values can be obtained from the given information that the wall contains 2 × 10^29 atoms/m^3, and I think that I can get my values for ρ and m from the following equation:
The number of atoms per unit volume = (Avogadro’s number × density)/atomic mass
That is: 2 × 10^29 atoms/m^3 = (6.022 × 10^23 mol^–1 × density)/atomic mass
This is where I’m not sure how to proceed, as I need to find the density and atomic mass (and convert it to kg as well) from this equation; any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Be careful here.

We know that the macroscopic cross-section, Σ, for an interaction is given by Σ = nσ, where n is the atomic density and σ is the microscopic cross section.

So Σs = nσs.

Now we also know that N(x) = No exp (-Σs x), where x is the distance traveled, and No is the initial particle intensity (we could use I(x) and Io).

All we need to do is find the distance (thickness) t at which half of the particles reach without scattering, and so they leave the other side (of slab thickness t), without having scattered.

So what is N(t)/No?
 
Now it makes sense using your equations; still straightforward, but different way of looking at things. Thank you very much for your help Astronuc, I really appreciate it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K