Solve Source Transformation Homework: V=3.35V, R=228.19kΩ

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a source transformation homework problem involving resistors and voltage sources. Participants clarify that the 250 kΩ and 550 kΩ resistors cannot be treated as series components due to the presence of a 1300 kΩ resistor at their junction. The correct approach involves using Thevenin equivalents to analyze the circuit step by step, ensuring that components like the 1300 kΩ resistor remain accessible for calculations. Misunderstandings about circuit analysis techniques, such as the "black box" method, are addressed, emphasizing the importance of maintaining certain components for accurate voltage and current calculations. The conversation concludes with encouragement and acknowledgment of the learning process in circuit analysis.
dwn
Messages
165
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Image Attached

Homework Equations



Ohm's

The Attempt at a Solution



Combined the two resistors in series : 250 + 550 = 800 kΩ
Source Transformation (Current Source): V = 140,000(2*10^-6)= 0.28 V
Combine the voltage sources : 6 - 0.28 = 5.72 V

But then I recreated the circuit with these figures and it just doesn't appear correct to me.
Voltage source = 5.72 V
Resistor = 800 + 140 = 940kΩ

Ans: V = 3.35 V R = 228.19 kΩ

I don't see how they're getting these figures.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-03-13 at 3.18.43 PM.jpg
    Screen Shot 2014-03-13 at 3.18.43 PM.jpg
    15.2 KB · Views: 550
Physics news on Phys.org
Can someone please explain to me what is going on here?
 
The 250 k and 550 k resistors are not in series: there's another connection at the node where they join (the 1300 k resistor) so they cannot be in series.

Your transformation of the 140 k resistor and 2 uA source to a voltage source (Thevenin equivalent) is fine, and combining it with the 6 V source to yield a net 5.720 V source is good too. What's the Thevenin resistance for that new combined source?

Your next step should be to incorporate the 550 k resistor, so another Thevenin equivalent voltage and resistance should result. You should end up with the original -11 V source, the 1300 k resistor and the new Thevenin resistance and voltage all in series.

The steps are summarized in the following figure. Working from right to left, convert and combine/incorporate components into Thevenin equivalent models as you go:

attachment.php?attachmentid=67598&stc=1&d=1394751908.gif
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    4 KB · Views: 813
  • Like
Likes 1 person
gneill, thank you very much for the clear and concise explanation. However, I do have a question...I thought that we were supposed to create a "black box" and create an open circuit at the end (the node where the 250 and 550 R meet) which would make them in series...apparently this is not the case and I misunderstood.
Do you alway start from the outside and work your way towards the center?
 
dwn said:
gneill, thank you very much for the clear and concise explanation. However, I do have a question...I thought that we were supposed to create a "black box" and create an open circuit at the end (the node where the 250 and 550 R meet) which would make them in series...apparently this is not the case and I misunderstood.
Do you alway start from the outside and work your way towards the center?

You work in the direction that achieves your goal :smile: I know that doesn't seem to help much... But in this case you are apparently looking to find the power dissipated by the 1300 k resistor so you know that you need to leave that one alone --- you can't transform it away into the guts of an equivalent circuit (Thevenin or Norton) because then you couldn't write any equations about it to find current or voltage for it; once you transform-away a component it becomes inaccessible to further analysis. So leaving it alone, you look towards the rest of the circuit. Most of it lies to the right of the 1300 k resistor, so you start at the far end and work back. That usually works well as a general approach.
 
My apologies for the poor quality in the photo. Where have I gone wrong in this problem? Still not arriving at the correct solution.

Note: all resistors are kΩ
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-03-13 at 8.41.24 PM.jpg
    Screen Shot 2014-03-13 at 8.41.24 PM.jpg
    33.7 KB · Views: 554
dwn said:
My apologies for the poor quality in the photo. Where have I gone wrong in this problem? Still not arriving at the correct solution.

Note: all resistors are kΩ

In your second step:

attachment.php?attachmentid=67609&stc=1&d=1394758246.gif


you've opted to transform to a Norton equivalent, but didn't include the 140 k resistance that is also in series with the voltage source. That means you would end up with something like this instead:

attachment.php?attachmentid=67610&stc=1&d=1394758606.gif


In this problem you have the option of just sticking with Thevenin equivalents all the way through.
 

Attachments

  • Fig2.gif
    Fig2.gif
    8.3 KB · Views: 603
  • Fig3.gif
    Fig3.gif
    2 KB · Views: 630
I was able to figure out the resistors and come up with the correct Rx -- what method are they using to find the voltage?

I apologize for the series of questions with this problem, but circuits are not coming easily for me.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-03-13 at 9.51.32 PM.jpg
    Screen Shot 2014-03-13 at 9.51.32 PM.jpg
    8 KB · Views: 511
dwn said:
I was able to figure out the resistors and come up with the correct Rx -- what method are they using to find the voltage?
Well, your thumbnail diagram shows a classic voltage divider scenario... that would yield the Thevenin voltage for that subcircuit.

I apologize for the series of questions with this problem, but circuits are not coming easily for me.
No worries, that's why we're here :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #10
Fantastic! Love it when this works. Starting the journey is a pain in the butt though.

Thanks for the help gneill
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top