Solve Thevenin Problem: Find Rth & Vth for Points A+B

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sastronaut
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thevenin
Sastronaut
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use thevenin techniques to find the equivalent circuit (Rth and Vth) to which the points A + B are attached.

Homework Equations



Kirchoffs loop rules
V=IR

The Attempt at a Solution


I have indicated my chosen loops in blue. I am not quit sure at this point how to apply kirchhoffs loop rule to each of the loops so that I can determine Vth. the only loop I felt confident on was number 1 i.e. 1: 5V-40ΩI1+Vth. There so much going on in the circuit that its hard from me to determine which way current is flowing so that I can create a junction rule for the wire between the yellow points. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • thevenin problem.jpg
    thevenin problem.jpg
    24.7 KB · Views: 439
Physics news on Phys.org
So why not redraw the circuit so that it looks less confusing?

Also, your loops 1 and 2 are useless since they "loop" around open circuits, which are not really loops at all.
 
Last edited:
how do you purpose I re-draw it
 
It was a suggestion. Don't do it if you don't want.

You have not addressed my comment about your loops 1 and 2
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top