SOLVED: Equipotential surfaces for finite line of charge

In summary, the potential at a point on the z axis is given by the equation \varphi = \frac{q}{r}. The potential at a point on the x axis is given by the equation \varphi = \int_{-d}^d \frac{\lambda\,dz'}{\sqrt{x^2 + (z-z')^2}}.
  • #1
homer
46
0

Homework Statement


Purcell 2.10 [/B][not the problem I'm asking about, but needed for Purcell 2.11 which I am asking about]
A thin rod extends along the z axis from [itex]z = -d[/itex] to [itex]z = d[/itex]. The rod carries a charge uniformly distributed along its length with linear charge density [itex]\lambda[/itex]. By integrating over this charge distribution calculate the potential at a point [itex]P_1[/itex] on the [itex]z[/itex] axis with coordinates [itex]0,0,2d[/itex]. By another integration find the potential at a point [itex]P_2[/itex] on the [itex]x[/itex] axis and locate this point to make the potential equal to the potential at [itex]P_1[/itex]

Purcell 2.11 [the problem I'm asking about]
The points [itex]P_1[/itex] and [itex]P_2[/itex] in the preceding problem happen to lie on an ellipse which has the ends of the rod as its foci, as you can readily verify by comparing the sums of the distances from [itex]P_1[/itex] and from [itex]P_2[/itex] to the ends of the rod. This suggests that the whole ellipse might be an equipotential. Test that conjectire by calculating the potential at the point [itex](3d/2, 0, d)[/itex] which lies on the same ellipse. Indeed it is true, though there is no obvious reason why it should be, that the equipotential surfaces of this system are a family of confocal prolate spheroids. See if you can prove that. You will have to derive a formula for the potential at a general point [itex](x,0,z)[/itex] in the [itex]xz[/itex] plane. Then show that, if [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]z[/itex] are related by the equation
[tex]
\frac{x^2}{a^2 - d^2} + \frac{z^2}{a^2} = 1,
[/tex]
which is the equation for an ellipse with foci at [itex]z = \pm d[/itex], the potential will depend only on the parameter [itex]a[/itex], not on [itex]x[/itex] or [itex]z[/itex].

Homework Equations


Setting our zero of potential at infinity, the potential of a point charge [itex]q[/itex] at a point a distance [itex]r[/itex] away is
[tex]
\varphi = \frac{q}{r}.
[/tex]
Note we're using cgs units, not SI units.

The equation of an ellipse with foci [itex]z = \pm d[/itex] and semimajor axis [itex]a[/itex] along the [itex]z[/itex] axis and semiminor axis [itex]a^2 - d^2[/itex] along the [itex]x[/itex] axis in the [itex]xz[/itex] plane
[tex]
\frac{x^2}{a^2 - d^2} + \frac{z^2}{a^2} = 1.
[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Consider a small charge element [itex]dq[/itex] of length [itex]dz'[/itex] of the rod, at position [itex]z'[/itex] on the [itex]z[/itex] axis. Treating this small charge element as a point charge, the infinitesimal potential at [itex](x,0,z)[/itex] due to this charge element is
[itex]
d\varphi(x,0,z) = \dfrac{dq}{\sqrt{x^2 + (z - z')^2}} = \dfrac{\lambda\,dz'}{\sqrt{x^2 + (z-z')^2}}.
[/itex]
Integrating along the entire rod from [itex]z = -d[/itex] to [itex]z = +d[/itex]. we find the potential to be given by the integral
[tex]
\varphi(x,0,z) = \int_{-d}^d \frac{\lambda\,dz'}{\sqrt{x^2 + (z-z')^2}}
[/tex]

If we make the trig substitution [itex]z - z' = x\tan{\theta}[/itex], we get [itex]-dz' = x\sec^2{\theta}\,d\theta[/itex] and our integral becomes
[tex]
\begin{align*}
\varphi(x,0,z)
& = \int_{\theta_1}^{\theta_2} \frac{-\lambda\, x\sec^2{\theta}\,d\theta}{\sqrt{x^2(1 + \tan^2{\theta})}} \\
& = \int_{\theta_2}^{\theta_1} \frac{\lambda\, x\sec^2{\theta}\,d\theta}{\sqrt{x^2 \sec^2{\theta}}} \\
& = \int_{\theta_2}^{\theta_1} \lambda\,\sec{\theta}\,d\theta \\
& = \lambda\, \text{ln}\Big[
\frac{\sec{\theta_1} + \tan{\theta_1}}{\sec{\theta_2} + \tan{\theta_2}}
\Big],
\end{align*}
[/tex]
where [itex]z - d = x\tan{\theta_2}[/itex] and [itex]z + d = x\tan{\theta_1}[/itex], so that
[tex]
\begin{align*}
\sec{\theta_1} & = \frac{\sqrt{x^2 + (z + d)^2}}{x} \\
\sec{\theta_2} & = \frac{\sqrt{x^2 + (z-d)^2}}{x}.
\end{align*}
[/tex]
Then our integral becomes
[tex]
\begin{align*}
\varphi(x,0,z)
& =
\lambda\, \text{ln}\Big[
\frac{\frac{1}{x} \sqrt{x^2 + (z+d)^2} + \frac{1}{x}(z+d)}
{\frac{1}{x} \sqrt{x^2 + (z-d)^2} + \frac{1}{x}(z-d)}
\Big] \\
& =
\lambda\, \text{ln}\Big[
\frac{z + d + \sqrt{x^2 + (z+d)^2}}
{z - d + \sqrt{x^2 + (z-d)^2}}
\Big].
\end{align*}
[/tex]

Now from the ellipse equation we have
[tex]
x^2 = (a^2 - d^2) \Big(1 - \frac{z^2}{a^2}\Big),
[/tex]
and we thus find
[tex]
\begin{align*}
x^2 + (z \pm d)^2 & =
(a^2 - d^2)\Big(1 - \frac{z^2}{a^2}\Big) + (z \pm d)^2 \\
& = \Big(a^2 - d^2 - z^2 + \frac{d^2}{a^2}z^2\Big) + (z^2 \pm 2d z + d^2) \\
& = a^2 + \frac{d^2}{a^2}z^2 \pm 2d z \\
& = \frac{1}{a^2}\Big(d^2 z^2 \pm 2 a^2 d z + a^4\Big) \\
& = \frac{1}{a^2}(d z \pm a^2)^2
\end{align*}
[/tex]
Thus we find
[tex]
\sqrt{x^2 + (z \pm d)^2} = \frac{1}{a} \lvert d z \pm a^2\rvert
[/tex]
so that our expression for the potential at point [itex](x,0,z)[/itex] becomes
[tex]
\begin{align*}
\varphi(x,0,z)
& = \text{ln}\Big[
\frac{z + d + \lvert dz + a^2\rvert/a}{z - d + \lvert dz - a^2\rvert/a}
\Big] \\
& = \text{ln}\Big[
\frac{a z + a d + \lvert dz + a^2\rvert}{a z - a d + \lvert dz - a^2\rvert}
\Big]
\end{align*}
[/tex]
Now I'm lost as to how to get rid of the [itex]z[/itex] term so that
[tex]
\varphi(x,0,z) = F(a,d)
[/tex]
for some function [itex]F[/itex] independent of [itex]x,z[/itex], as the problem requests us to find.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Let's just for the minute assume [itex]x > 0[/itex] also.
 
  • #3
I think I figured it out now. Always seems to happen right after I type up the whole problem here!
 
  • #4
By the symmetry of the problem sign of [itex]x,z[/itex] doesn't matter, so I'll just take both positive. Then [itex]\lvert dz - a^2\vert = a^2 - dz[/itex] and [itex]\lvert dz + a^2\rvert = dz + a^2[/itex], so the expression for the potential becomes
[tex]
\begin{align*}
\varphi(x,0,z)
& =
\lambda\,\text{ln}\Big[
\frac{az + ad + a^2 + dz}{az - ad + a^2 - dz}
\Big] \\
& =
\lambda\,\text{ln}\Big[
\frac{a(z + a) + d(z+a)}{a(z+a) - d(z+a)}
\Big] \\
& = \lambda\,\text{ln}\Big[\frac{a+d}{a-d}\Big].
\end{align*}
[/tex]

Now I just have to check the separate cases [itex]x = 0, z = a[/itex] and [itex]x = \sqrt{a^2 - d^2}, z = 0[/itex].
 
  • #5
This was a cool problem. Man I love Purcell.
 

1. What are equipotential surfaces?

Equipotential surfaces are imaginary surfaces that represent points with the same electric potential. In other words, any point on an equipotential surface will have the same amount of electric potential, regardless of its position or distance from the source of the electric field.

2. What is a finite line of charge?

A finite line of charge is a charged object that has a finite length or size, as opposed to an infinite line of charge which has an infinite length. It is often represented as a straight line with a positive or negative charge distributed evenly along its length.

3. How are equipotential surfaces for a finite line of charge calculated?

The electric potential for a finite line of charge can be calculated using the equation V = kλln(b/a), where k is the Coulomb's constant, λ is the linear charge density, and a and b are the distances from the line of charge to the point where the potential is being calculated. Using this equation, equipotential surfaces can be plotted for different values of potential.

4. What is the significance of equipotential surfaces for a finite line of charge?

Equipotential surfaces are important because they allow us to visualize the electric field around a finite line of charge. They show us the points where the electric potential is the same, and the direction of the electric field can be determined by the perpendicular direction to the equipotential surfaces.

5. Can equipotential surfaces be used to calculate the electric field around a finite line of charge?

Yes, the electric field can be calculated at any point using the equipotential surfaces. The direction of the electric field is always perpendicular to the equipotential surfaces, and its magnitude can be calculated using the equation E = -∇V, where ∇V is the gradient of the electric potential at the point of interest.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
202
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
64
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
930
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
904
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
571
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
270
Back
Top