Solving 2-D Schrodinger Equation?

sciguy2010
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle of mass m is confined in a two-dimensions by the potential energy V = 1/2k(x2+4y2). Write down the Schrodinger equation for the system. Write down the ground state wave function and find the lowest four energy levels in terms of the quantities ħ, k, m etc. Make clear which, if any, of the levels is degenerate. Use any of the results you need from the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator without proof.

Homework Equations



Schrodinger's equation, two-dimensional:

[(-ħ/2m)(d2/d2x + d2/d2y) + V(x)] \psiE(x,y)]=E \psiE(x,y)

One-dimensional harmonic oscillator equations:

\psi0 = (m\omega0/ħ\pi)e-ax2

\omegao=\sqrt{k/m}

a=\sqrt{km}/2ħ

En = (n+1/2)ħ\omega0

The Attempt at a Solution



Schrodinger's equation:

[(-ħ2/2m)(d2/d2x + d2/d2y) + 1/2k(x2+4y2)] \psiE(x,y)=E\psiE(x,y)

After this I'm not really sure what to do. As for what to plug in where, and how to solve for the energy levels. Do I use the equation to solve for the energy levels? How?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you can treat x and y separately and simply write down the 1D stuff you already know, you will have to find out what the scaling factors are in each case if they differ from the canonical HO, but, say, for the energy eigenvalues, I think it will just be a sum of the energies in each direction with independent integer labels, n, m.
 
Assume a solution of the form \psi(x,y) = X(x)Y(y) and use separation of variables.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top