Solving a Calculation Problem - Basic Math/Stress Energy Tensor

  • Thread starter Thread starter kalish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculation
kalish
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hello, I have a basic calculation problem. I have to find a term in the stress energy tensor from a lagrangian, that has many terms. I found the correct equation at first but know I think I made a mistake in calculation.

here is the term that make me problem, I have to find \frac{\delta(\sqrt{-g}\partial_\alpha \phi \partial^\alpha \phi)}{\delta g^{\mu\nu}} = \sqrt{-g}( \partial_\mu \partial_\nu \phi -\frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu}\partial_\alpha \phi \partial^\alpha \phi)

indeed that's what I found. BUT I found it using \frac{ \delta g^{\alpha\beta}}{\delta g^{\mu\nu}} \sqrt{-g}\partial_\alpha \partial_\beta \phi = \delta^\alpha_\mu \delta^\beta_\nu<br /> \sqrt{-g}\partial_\alpha \partial_\beta \phi

but now I strongly believe that
\frac{ \delta g^{\alpha\beta}}{\delta g^{\mu\nu}} \sqrt{-g}\partial_\alpha \partial_\beta \phi = (\delta^\alpha_\mu \delta^\beta_\nu + \delta^\alpha_\nu \delta^\beta_\mu ) \sqrt{-g}\partial_\alpha \partial_\beta \phi

that means twice the first term, and that is a problem as my final result will look like

\sqrt{-g}( 2\partial_\mu \partial_\nu \phi -\frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu}\partial_\alpha \phi \partial^\alpha \phi)

So where is the problem please? I am a little ashamed, I thought about it before but I wasn't convinced as I found the good result.
This is not homework as I have to make a calculation that has already been made during my training, not quite a homework.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, I found my mistake.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top