Solving a Complex Integral Problem by Hand

p0tat0phun
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem is given in the following image.
http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/2972/lskfjsf.png


Homework Equations


∫h(r)*dr = ∫h[r(u)]*r'(u)du


The Attempt at a Solution


I was able to figure out plugging in (t^2+3) at every x and sin(1/2πt) at every y. I then set up the dot product of the substituted equation and r'(u)du (2t + 1/2πcos(1/2πt)). The problem is, the integral ends up being much to complex to work by hand since I'm not allowed to use a calculator for this problem. So I was wondering if there was an easier way to work this problem out?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
p0tat0phun said:

Homework Statement


The problem is given in the following image.
http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/2972/lskfjsf.png


Homework Equations


∫h(r)*dr = ∫h[r(u)]*r'(u)du


The Attempt at a Solution


I was able to figure out plugging in (t^2+3) at every x and sin(1/2πt) at every y. I then set up the dot product of the substituted equation and r'(u)du (2t + 1/2πcos(1/2πt)). The problem is, the integral ends up being much to complex to work by hand since I'm not allowed to use a calculator for this problem. So I was wondering if there was an easier way to work this problem out?

Think about why the first part asked you to find f(x,y) whose gradient is the given vector field. Perhaps you can use that f(x,y) somehow, hint, hint.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Okay, so I found f(x,y) to be:
3x + e^x*y^2 + 3e^x*y + 2e^x + y^2
But I'm still confused on where to continue with that.
 
p0tat0phun said:
Okay, so I found f(x,y) to be:
3x + e^x*y^2 + 3e^x*y + 2e^x + y^2
But I'm still confused on where to continue with that.

Your text should have a theorem about evaluating line integrals when you have a potential function f(x,y), and that is the whole point of this problem.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top