Solving a Copper Metal Heat Exchange Problem: Seeking Advice

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a heat exchange problem involving two identical copper blocks at different temperatures, seeking to understand the heat transfer during their thermal equilibrium. The specific heat of copper is noted as 0.1 kilocalorie/kilogram K, which is crucial for calculating the energy required to change the temperature of one block. It is emphasized that while the final temperature will be the same for both blocks, the amount of heat exchanged can vary based on the materials and sizes involved. The conversation highlights the distinction between heat and temperature, reinforcing a fundamental thermodynamic principle. Understanding these concepts is key to solving the problem effectively.
kirste
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Just looking through some old papers and found a problem that I don't know how to solve.

Two identical 1.0-kilogram blocks of copper metal, one initially at a temp OC and the other initially at a temp of 100C are enclosed in a perfectly insulating container. The two blocks are initially separated. When the blocks are placed in contact, they come to equilibrium at a final temp of Tf. The amount of heat exchanged between the two blocks in this process is equal to which of the following? (the specific heat of copper metal is equal to 0.1 kilocalorie/kilogram K

I know that Spec. Heat=J/g.C, but other than that can someone give some general advice on how to solve this problem?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assume they come to equilibrium at a temperate half way between 0,100
So work out the energy needed to heat a block by 50K
 
thats exactly what I needed to know :)
 
It's an important difference between heat and temperature - actually pretty much the fundamental law of thermodynamics = Temperatures will always end up the same however much heat has to be transferred to make that happen.

If the blocks were different materials or size they would still end up at the same temperature although not necessarily 50deg - and the energy flowing between them would not be the same.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top