Solving a Factoring Problem in Calculus without a Calculator

  • Thread starter Thread starter zombeast
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factoring
zombeast
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I'm in calculus, but we're having this test on some curve sketing soon and I'm doing some practice problems that the teacher gave us. We're not allowed to use a calculator in this calculus class (except for very rare instances) so we have to know how to sketch graphs with no problem!

I'm wondering I have factored this correctly. If not, I'm wondering if someone can point me in the right direction.

Orginal Equation:
<br /> x^3 - 3x^2-6x+8<br />

My Factors
<br /> (x+2)(x^2-2x+4) - 3x(x+2) <br />

Turns into ...

<br /> (1-3x)(x+2)(x^2 -2x + 4) <br />

If anyone could help me out I would appreciate it.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can always multiply them back out to see if it gets you where you started.
 
Your original polynomial has degree 3 yet you have 4 factors involving x!

Hint: (x+2)(x^2-2x+4) - 3x(x+2) is correct but
ab- ca= a(b- c) NOT ab(1-c).
 
Ok, thanks for the help thus far. I was able to remember (through the help of another math friend) that if all the coefficients of the polynomial add up to zero, it is divisble by x-1 and x-1 is one of the factors. Therefore I had to take x-1 and divide it into x^3 - 3x^2 -6x+8 and I was given x^2-2x-8. From that I could get the other two factors (x-4)(x+2)

Thanks for looking at it though.
 
Your factored expression is a 4th degree polynomial while your original expression is a 3rd degree polynomial.

As HallsofIvy said, (x+2)(x^2-2x+4) - 3x(x+2) is correct, and the factored form should be

(x+2)(2nd degree poly).
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top