Solving a Lightning Storm Homework Problem

vdeity
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A certain storm cloud has a potential of 1.50 x 10^8 V relative to a tree. If, during a lightning storm, 50.0 C of charge is transferred through this potential difference and 1.00% of the energy is absorbed by the tree, how much sap in the tree can be boiled away? Model the sap as water initially at 26.0°C. Water has a specific heat of 4186 J/(kg·C°), a boiling point of 100°C, and a latent heat of vaporization of 2.26 x 10^6 J/kg.


Homework Equations



I'm actually kinda iffy on all the equations, but I got several answers that WebAssign told me was wrong...

The Attempt at a Solution



Energy gain of 50.0 C of charge accelerated through potential difference of (1.50 x 10^8 V) is (50.0 C)(1.50 x 10^8 V) = 7.5 x 10^9 J.

To vaporize 1 kilogram of sap requires mcΔT = (1 kg)(4186 J/kg K)(100 - 26 degrees C) = 3.098 x 10^(5) J to heat to 100 degrees C

An additional 2.26 x 10^6 J for the state change from liquid to gas, for a total required energy of 3.098 x 10^(5) + 2.26 x 10^6 = 2.57 x 10^6 J.

The total energy absorbed is 1% of 7.5 x 10^9 = 7.5 x 10^7 J, and at 2.57 x 10^6 J per kg needed, we are able to vaporize:

(7.5 x 10^7 J)/(2.57 x 10^6 J/kg) = 29.19 kg of sap.

WebAssign says it's wrong.

Please tell me where I went wrong.
It isn't due for a few days, I just wanted to get this assignment out of the way... Last question.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


WebAssign is evil. I see nothing wrong with your solution - your method is OK and I verified your numbers. It may be a matter of sig figs or (perish the thought) the wrong calculated formula has been put into the problem. I suggest that you take your solution to your instructor and ask him/her to find what is wrong with it. Do this before the deadline.
 


Sorry to bring up an old thread, but I was under the impression that the energy absorbed by the tree will be equal to 1/2QV, and not QV. I'd be curious to hear what others have to say about this.

Thanks,

Tom
 


That would be true if you had a capacitor with 50C on it that you let completely discharge.
The question doesn't say that the stormcloud completely discharges however.
 


I see what you're saying. Thanks.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top