Engineering Solving a Peculiar Circuit: Find the Transfer Function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the transfer function Vout(s)/Vi(s) for a circuit where Vout is across an inductor, rather than referencing ground. The user, Leo, initially used the mesh-current method to derive the transfer function, resulting in H(s) = 3s^2/(6s^3 + 5s^2 + 20s + 10). Other participants confirmed the correctness of his solution and suggested that nodal analysis could also be an effective approach for similar problems. Leo expressed gratitude for the feedback and validation of his method. The conversation highlights the importance of different analytical techniques in circuit analysis.
Leomusic
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

New to the forums here, but I've got a question for you guys:

I've ran into this rather peculiar circuit. In all the circuits I've seen (as far as transfer functions go), Vout has always referenced ground (e.g. one node of Vout is ground); in this one, however Vout is across an inductor. I've attached the circuit diagram. (excuse the crudeness of the circuit diagram...quickly whipped it up on Paint :rolleyes:).


Homework Statement



Find the transfer function Vout(s)/Vi(s) of the circuit.

R=1Ω, L1=2H, L2=3H, C=0.1F

Homework Equations



Zr = R; Zl=Ls; Zc=1/Cs; KVL; KCL, etc.

The Attempt at a Solution



Since Vout wasn't referencing ground, I figured that I needed to use the mesh-current method to get equations for Vi and Vout for each loop. After some rather nasty symbolic matrix algebra, I got expressions for I1 and I2 (loop currents), plugged each of those back into the mesh-current equations, and obtained:

H(s)=\frac{V_{out}}{V_{i}}=\frac{3s^2}{6s^3+5s^2+20s+10}

Is this correct? Also another question: is there a simpler way to do this? Forgive my idiocy but I might be missing something terribly obvious...

It's been a while since this textbook stuff! I tinker around quite a bit with circuits, but I'm no EE...I guess that's what I get for being mechanical :biggrin:

Thanks everyone!

-Leo.
 

Attachments

  • RLC problem.png
    RLC problem.png
    6.9 KB · Views: 638
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Your solution looks good. Your method is fine too.
 


Leomusic said:
Is this correct? Also another question: is there a simpler way to do this? Forgive my idiocy but I might be missing something terribly obvious...

Nodal analysis also works well for these transfer function problems. See the image.
 

Attachments

  • Circuit.png
    Circuit.png
    2.5 KB · Views: 538


Sounds good! Thanks a lot guys.

-Leo.
 


I too can corroborate your answer as being correct. Happy days!
 
Thread 'Have I solved this structural engineering equation correctly?'
Hi all, I have a structural engineering book from 1979. I am trying to follow it as best as I can. I have come to a formula that calculates the rotations in radians at the rigid joint that requires an iterative procedure. This equation comes in the form of: $$ x_i = \frac {Q_ih_i + Q_{i+1}h_{i+1}}{4K} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i-1} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i+1} $$ Where: ## Q ## is the horizontal storey shear ## h ## is the storey height ## K = (6G_i + C_i + C_{i+1}) ## ## G = \frac {I_g}{h} ## ## C...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top