Solving a Problem: Have I Made a Mistake or Are the Solutions Wrong?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving for variables a, b, and c in a problem involving the intersection of a fire front with a farm area. The original assumption about the affected area and the method of solving for the variables is questioned due to having three unknowns with only one equation. The correct approach involves identifying the intersection points of the fire front equation and the farm boundaries, leading to the conclusion that b equals 2ln5. Additionally, a correction is noted regarding the first intersection point and the equation for area A, which should reflect the correct dimensions based on the intersections. The participant acknowledges a misinterpretation of the fire front's interaction with the property boundaries.
Darkmisc
Messages
222
Reaction score
31
Homework Statement
Is there a mistake in the below solution?
Relevant Equations
Definite integrals
Hi everyone

To solve the below problem, I assumed the affected area was 2x2 minus the definite integral of the given function between 2 and 4.

I then equated the answer for that with the given function to solve for a, b and c.

I don't know why the solutions give b as 2ln5.

Have I made a mistake, or are the solutions wrong?

Thanks
1659060948532.png
1659061161845.png

1659060532095.png


1659060568090.png


1659060622160.png
 

Attachments

  • 1659060912174.png
    1659060912174.png
    11 KB · Views: 141
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are trying to work out a, b and c by solving equations. That cannot work, as you have three unknowns and only one equation. Instead you set the values a and b from first principles, as the lower and upper bounds of x at which the fire front intersects the farm. Given the fire front equation is ##f(x) = \frac12 e^{\frac x2}-\frac12## and the farm is ##[2,4]\times [0,2]## we see that the intersection points are ##(2,e^\frac12)## and ##(b,2)##, the second point being where the fire front intersects the line ##y=2##. That second point gives us the equation
$$2 = f(b)=\frac12 e^\frac b2-\frac12$$
which we solve to get
$$b=2\log 5$$
Now that you know ##a## and ##b## you can solve the equation to find ##c##.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and Darkmisc
A small correction to @andrewkirk post ,the first point of intersection is ##(2,f(2))=(2,\frac{e-1}{2})##.
 
I also think that the "4=(4-2)x(2-0)" in your equation for A shouldn't be 4 but instead ##(b-2)\times(2-0)=2(b-2)##, hard to explain with words without making a scheme (I am really bad in making schemes).
 
Yeah, I drew the diagram for myself wrong. I assumed the fire front would touch the right edge of the property (which it didn't).
 
First, I tried to show that ##f_n## converges uniformly on ##[0,2\pi]##, which is true since ##f_n \rightarrow 0## for ##n \rightarrow \infty## and ##\sigma_n=\mathrm{sup}\left| \frac{\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x\right)}{n^{x^2-3x+3}} \right| \leq \frac{1}{|n^{x^2-3x+3}|} \leq \frac{1}{n^{\frac 34}}\rightarrow 0##. I can't use neither Leibnitz's test nor Abel's test. For Dirichlet's test I would need to show, that ##\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x \right)## has partialy bounded sums...