Solving a Problem: Have I Made a Mistake or Are the Solutions Wrong?

Darkmisc
Messages
222
Reaction score
31
Homework Statement
Is there a mistake in the below solution?
Relevant Equations
Definite integrals
Hi everyone

To solve the below problem, I assumed the affected area was 2x2 minus the definite integral of the given function between 2 and 4.

I then equated the answer for that with the given function to solve for a, b and c.

I don't know why the solutions give b as 2ln5.

Have I made a mistake, or are the solutions wrong?

Thanks
1659060948532.png
1659061161845.png

1659060532095.png


1659060568090.png


1659060622160.png
 

Attachments

  • 1659060912174.png
    1659060912174.png
    11 KB · Views: 137
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are trying to work out a, b and c by solving equations. That cannot work, as you have three unknowns and only one equation. Instead you set the values a and b from first principles, as the lower and upper bounds of x at which the fire front intersects the farm. Given the fire front equation is ##f(x) = \frac12 e^{\frac x2}-\frac12## and the farm is ##[2,4]\times [0,2]## we see that the intersection points are ##(2,e^\frac12)## and ##(b,2)##, the second point being where the fire front intersects the line ##y=2##. That second point gives us the equation
$$2 = f(b)=\frac12 e^\frac b2-\frac12$$
which we solve to get
$$b=2\log 5$$
Now that you know ##a## and ##b## you can solve the equation to find ##c##.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and Darkmisc
A small correction to @andrewkirk post ,the first point of intersection is ##(2,f(2))=(2,\frac{e-1}{2})##.
 
I also think that the "4=(4-2)x(2-0)" in your equation for A shouldn't be 4 but instead ##(b-2)\times(2-0)=2(b-2)##, hard to explain with words without making a scheme (I am really bad in making schemes).
 
Yeah, I drew the diagram for myself wrong. I assumed the fire front would touch the right edge of the property (which it didn't).
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top