Solving a Problem with LPHW Radiator

  • Thread starter Thread starter jami8337
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radiator
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a problem with an LPHW radiator, specifically how to represent the relationship between control signals, flow rates, and heat output through block diagrams. The first block diagram should include a controller, LPHW valve, flow rate, and a first-order transfer function to accurately depict the system dynamics. For the second diagram, the relationship between heat output and room temperature is explored, requiring an understanding of thermal resistance and possibly thermal mass for dynamic situations. The user is attempting to derive the transfer function based on energy balance equations, leading to a formulation that connects the LPHW temperature, output temperature, and heat flow rate. The conversation also references external resources to clarify the transfer function's relationship with room air temperature and radiator output.
jami8337
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I am trying to solve a problem regarding an LPHW radiator, of which the heat output is controlled by adjusting the LPHW flow rate. The relationship between the flow rate and the radiator output can be approximated by a first order transfer function with a time constant of 1 minute. The heat output is adjusted by a control signal directed to a final control device that determines the LPHW flow rate.

I now need to draw two open loop block diagrams The first showing the relationship between the control signal and the radiator heat output. The second of the relationship between the heat output and the room temperature.

I am at a loss on what to do for the first diagram, however it may just be me overthinking it. Would it simply be:

i ----> Controller -----> LPHW Valve -------> Heat Output

Any insight would be greatly appreciated

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think you probably need to add a block showing the first order transfer function. Something like..

I---> Controller -> LPHW Valve --> LPHW Flow rate ---> Transfer function ----> Heat Output

Replace "Transfer function" with the actual equation.

Not sure how to do the second one. I'm familiar with steady state heat loss calculations (you need thing like the thermal resistance of the walls and the temperature gradient across them) but your question suggest a dynamic situation (for which you probably need information on the thermal mass?).

Sorry that's the best I can manage.
 
Thanks for your help, I think i can draw both the block diagrams, but I am hitting a wall when having to derive the transfer function for the first one. This would be based on the energy balance equation i believe, but i am a bit lost trying to derive that. I have come up with:

(TW-Ti)/R

Where Tw is the temperature of the LPHW, and Ti is the room temp...
 
Okay here is what i have come up with:

Temperature LPHW = θL
Temperature Output = θO
Heat Flow rate = Q

Q=(θLO)/R

Assuming no losses. The heat transferred from the LPHW alone determines the 'Radiator output' to the room. Therefore the rate of heat transfer will determine the rate of change of the radiator output, hence:

O/dt = Q/C (C = Capacitance)

Then:

O/dt = (θLO)/RC

I can then rearrange this and take a laplace transform to give me the transfer function. Does this sound like the right sort of track to be on?

Thanks!
 
Whats up? Any further news regarding these efforts?
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top