Solving a Puzzling Solar Radiation Problem

Beer-monster
Messages
285
Reaction score
0
Hi guys

I'm flicking thorugh some past papers for an upcoming exam and came across this seemingly easy problem.

"The average intensity of solar radiation at the Earth is 1.4kW/m^2. Assuming the Earth is a perfect absorber, calculate the force exerted by the radiation on the surface of the Earth. The mean radius of the Earth is 6400 km"

Now I know that the radiation pressure on a perfect absorber is equal to the energy density, which is equal to the intensity divided by the speed of light.

P = U = \frac{I}{c}

Given that P=F/A I get that the force should be.

F = \frac {IA}{c} = \frac {I 4\pi R^2}{c}

Although it could be \frac {I 2\pi R^2}{c}

As the sunlight only directly hits approximately half of the Earth's surface. But either way, when I plug in the numbers I don't get the answer my Lecturer gave of 600 MN.

I must be missing something, but I can't see it. If any of you guys can I'd appreciate it.:biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the sunlight is essentially parallel, the area of interest is that of a circle (not a hemisphere or sphere).
 
That makes sense, since I had noticed I was out by a factor of 4, I just couldn't come up with the physical meaning.

Thanks Doc Al
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top