Solving Acceleration of M1: Blocks and Pulleys

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration of block M1 in a system of blocks connected by frictionless pulleys. The user initially struggles with the relationship between the tensions T1 and T2 and assumes both blocks have the same acceleration. It is clarified that the blocks do not share the same acceleration due to their connection through the pulleys, leading to a correction in the equations. The user eventually realizes the need for a constraint equation to relate the two accelerations, which helps in deriving the correct relationship between T1 and T2. The final insight allows the user to express the acceleration accurately, resolving their initial confusion.
Patta1667
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Blocks of mass M1 and m2 (as shown in attachment) are connected by a system of frictionless pulleys by massless strings. What is the acceleration of M1?

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



Let T1 be the tension in the first (higher) string, and T2 be the tension in the second string. Then the total force on block M1 (assuming it falls) is F_{M_1} = M_1 g - T_1 = M_1 a and the force on block M2 is F_{M_2} = T_2 - M_2 g = M_2 a. THe blocks should have the same acceleration (one up, one down of course) so the relavent equations may be set equal to each other and solved for T_1 as a function of T_2 with no accelerations involved. Unfortunately I get stuck here, as I cannot see the relationship between the tensions and how to eliminate them in the acceleration of the block M_1. Any help?
 

Attachments

  • Pulleys.jpg
    Pulleys.jpg
    5.6 KB · Views: 474
Physics news on Phys.org
To relate the two tensions, analyze forces on pulley 2.
 
Doc Al said:
To relate the two tensions, analyze forces on pulley 2.

Pulley 2 has the force T_1 upwards, and twice the force T_2 downwards, correct? This would lead to T_1 = 2 T_2, which I believe was the first technique I tried and failed with.
 
Patta1667 said:
Pulley 2 has the force T_1 upwards, and twice the force T_2 downwards, correct? This would lead to T_1 = 2 T_2, which I believe was the first technique I tried and failed with.
Looks right to me. Show exactly what you did.
 
Patta1667 said:
THe blocks should have the same acceleration (one up, one down of course)...
There's the problem: The blocks do not have the same acceleration. Fix your equations for M1 and M2.
 
M_1a = M_1 g - T_1
M_2 a = T_2 - M_2 g (a_1 = a_2, so just replaced by a)
a = g - \frac{T_1}{M_1} = \frac{T_2}{M_2} - g
2g = \frac{T_1}{M_1} + \frac{T_2}{M_2} = \frac{2T_2}{M_1} + \frac{T_2}{M_2} = T_2 \left( \frac{2}{M_1} + \frac{1}{M_2} \right)

Since T_1 = 2T_2 we get:

T_2 = \frac{2g}{\frac{2}{M_1} + \frac{1}{M_2}} \implies T_1 = \frac{4g}{\frac{2}{M_1} + \frac{1}{M_2}}

Substituting this into the equation for a = g - \frac{T_1}{M_1}, we get:

a = g - \frac{4g}{\frac{2}{M_1} + \frac{1}{M_2}} \frac{1}{M_1} = g - \frac{4g M_1 M_2}{2M_2 + M_1} \frac{1}{M_1} = g - \frac{4 g M_2}{2M_2 + M_1}

The text's "hint" says let M_1 = M_2, then a = \frac{1}{5} g. Doing so with my equation,

a = g - \frac{4g M_1}{2M_1 + M_1} = g - \frac{4}{3} g = \frac{-1}{3} g.

Was my derivation incorrect?
 
Patta1667 said:
M_1a = M_1 g - T_1
M_2 a = T_2 - M_2 g (a_1 = a_2, so just replaced by a)
Your assumption that a_1 = a_2 is incorrect. Hint: When pulley 2 moves up 1m, how far does M2 move up?
 
Doc Al said:
There's the problem: The blocks do not have the same acceleration. Fix your equations for M1 and M2.

Ah, okay.

a_1 = g - \frac{2 t_2}{M_1}
a_2 = \frac{T_2}{M_2} - g

I can eliminate T_2 between the equations, using T_1 = 2 T_2, and this leads to :

T_2 = M_2 ( a_2 + g) = \frac{M_1}{2} (g - a_1)

Now I can relate a_1 to a_2 simply, but I cannot find a way to absolutely express a_1 without tensions or a_2 in the equation. Am I missing an equation to help me solve this?
 
Last edited:
Oops, I means 2 a_1 = a_2. This leads to the right answer, thanks Doc!
 
  • #10
Patta1667 said:
Now I can relate a_1 to a_2 simply, but I cannot find a way to absolutely express a_1 without tensions or a_2 in the equation. Am I missing an equation to help me solve this?
You are missing the constraint equation that relates the two accelerations. (They have a fixed relationship because of how the pulleys are connected.) See my hint in the last post to figure it out.
[edit] a_1 = 2 a_2?
Almost. (Careful which is which.)

Edit: Ah... I see you got it. Good!
 
Back
Top