Solving an Electric Circuit with Kirchhoff's Voltage Law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving an electric circuit problem using Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, involving a resistor, capacitor, and inductor connected in series with a voltage source. The equation derived from the circuit parameters leads to a second-order differential equation for the charge on the capacitor, expressed as d²q/dt² + 6dq/dt + 5q = 26 cos t. A participant seeks clarification on the relationship between current and charge, specifically how the derivative of current relates to the second derivative of charge. The explanation provided clarifies that current is the first derivative of charge, and the second derivative arises from differentiating the current with respect to time. Understanding these relationships is crucial for solving the circuit problem accurately.
pokgai
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An electric circuit consists of a resistor with a resistance of 12 ohms, a capacitor with
a capacitance of 0:1 farads and an inductor with an inductance of 2 henry connected in
series with a voltage source of 52 cos t volts. Initially the charge on the capacitor is 3
coulombs and the current in the circuit is zero.
(a) Using Kirchho 's voltage law, show that the charge q(t) coulombs on the capacitor
at time t seconds satisfi es
d2q/dt2 +6dq/dt+5q = 26 cos t


Homework Equations



V-iR-q/c-Ldi/dt=0

The Attempt at a Solution


It's pretty basic in that you just plug in the values.
52cos(t)-dq/dt12-q/0.1-2di/dt=0
The only thing I don't understand is the relation with di/dt. I am doing calculus and as such I am not familiar with physics. Just wondering how does that di/dt become d^2q/dt^2.

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The current i is the derivative of the charge q with respect to time:

i=dq/dt.

di/dt is the derivative of i with respect to time, that is

di/dt=d(di/dt)/dt,

it is called "the second derivative" of q and denoted as

d^2d/dt^2.

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top