Solving an Inconceivable Problem: Comparing Methods for Calculating Vc

  • Thread starter Thread starter vebes02
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To determine the race car's speed in a windless scenario, two methods are proposed: averaging the speeds from both directions or dividing the total distance by the average time. The first method yields Vc = 1/2[d/t1 + d/t2], while the second gives Vc = 2d/(t1 + t2). The discussion highlights the challenge of algebra involved in the problem, particularly when factoring in wind speed, which complicates calculations. Clarification is sought regarding the total distance and the impact of wind speed on the car's speed. The conversation emphasizes the need for additional information to accurately incorporate the wind's effect into the speed calculations.
vebes02
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


To set a speed record in measured (straight) distance d, a race car must be driven first in one direction (in time t1) and then in the opposite direction (in time t2). (a) To eliminate the effects of the wind and obtain the car's speed vc in a windless situation, should we find the average of d/t1 and d/t2 (method 1) or should we divide d by the average of t1 and t2? (b) What is the fractional difference in the two methods when a steady wind blows along the car's route and the ratio of the wind speed vw to the car's speed vc is 0.0240?


2. The attempt at a solution
I've tried Part A, and got:
Method 1: Vc = 1/2[d/t1 + d/t2]
Method 2: Vc = 2d/(t1 + t2)


Overall, this problem is irksome. I've spent the past 2 hours working on it, and my answers have become inconceivable. It's not even one of the problems I'm assigned to do, but I have an annoying tendency to finish whatever I completed, meaning if I wrote the problem down, I have to solve it.

So to those who can help, much appreciation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
Actually (as is not uncommon in physics), the physics of this problem is really easy, it's just the algebra that may give you headaches. You can just use the formula d = v t, where v is the effective velocity and t is the time. You can write down expressions for v = v1 when t = t1 and for v = v2 when t = t2. This gives you two equations: use one of them to eliminate vw (the speed of the wind) and you will get an equation for d in terms of vc, t1 and t2 from which you can obtain an equation for vc in terms of d, t1 and t2.
 
What I'm not sure about is, is d the total distance covered, or merely the distance traveled in one direction?
 
d is the distance in 1 direction.
 
But if we get rid of vw, how would we be able to incorporate 0.0240 into the problem?
 
It seems we have not been given the information required. How is the car's speed affected by the wind speed vw? Is there a discussion of this in your textbook somewhere, or is there more info given in the problem statement that was not included in your original post?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top