Solving an Integral Problem: Finding the Definite Integral

  • Thread starter Thread starter duelle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Stuck
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the definite integral of the function \(\int \frac {t^2 - 3}{-t^3 + 9t + 1} dt\). Participants clarify the correct application of the substitution method, specifically using \(u = -t^3 + 9t + 1\) and its derivative \(du = -3t^2 + 9\;dt\). A critical error identified was the incorrect handling of \(dt\) during the substitution process, which should be expressed as \(dt = -\frac{du}{3(t^2-3)}\). This correction simplifies the integral and leads to the proper solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of definite integrals
  • Familiarity with substitution methods in calculus
  • Knowledge of derivatives and their application
  • Proficiency in logarithmic functions, specifically \(\int \frac {du}{u} = \ln|u| + C\)
NEXT STEPS
  • Review substitution techniques in integral calculus
  • Practice solving definite integrals with polynomial functions
  • Explore advanced integration methods, including integration by parts
  • Study the properties of logarithmic functions in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians focusing on integration techniques, and anyone seeking to improve their problem-solving skills in integral calculus.

duelle
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1. The problem
Find the definite integral.
\int \frac {t^2 - 3}{-t^3 + 9t + 1} dt2. The attempt at a solution
The answer is the book made it seem like the rule \int \frac {du}{u} = ln|u| + C was used. Here's what I got:
u = -t^3 + 9t + 1
du = -3t^2 + 9\;dt
-\frac{1}{3}du = t^2 + 9\;dt
Obviously this won't work out, so is there something I'm overlooking that anyone can point out?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
yes that rule is used, but when you take du, you're entire quantity needs to be multiplied by dt.
 
the last line of your calculation is wrong.

notice that it should be:
-\frac{1}{3}du=(t^2-3)dt

you forgot changing the dt.
 
you've got the right substitution. By rearranging your du formula for dt you'll get:

dt = -du/(3(t^2-3))
and it will cancel out leaving you with the simple integral
 
Last edited:
Wow, I feel dumb. Thanks for pointing that out, though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K