Solving an RC circuit question using Superposition

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on solving an RC circuit problem using superposition, specifically analyzing the current across resistor R11 after a switch is opened at t=0. The initial current is calculated as 66.67 micro Amps from the 8V source, with an additional component of 16.666 e^{-t/120} micro Amps from the capacitor. The user questions whether these currents should be added or subtracted, as both sources direct current towards R11. The consensus indicates that while superposition is applicable, the capacitor's contribution is treated as a variable voltage source, leading to a subtraction in the final expression.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of RC circuits and their behavior over time
  • Familiarity with superposition theorem in circuit analysis
  • Knowledge of nodal analysis techniques
  • Basic concepts of time constants in capacitor discharge
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the superposition theorem in electrical circuits
  • Learn about nodal analysis in circuit theory
  • Explore the behavior of capacitors in RC circuits over time
  • Investigate the concept of Thevenin's theorem for simplifying circuits
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone interested in advanced circuit analysis techniques, particularly in the context of RC circuits and superposition.

ecy5maa
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hello,

The circuit attached below is from Richard Dorfs Intro to Electric Circuits book. The switch is shut for a long time and opened at t=0.

The question asks to find the i(t) across R11, which they use nodal analaysis and find it to be 66.67 - 16.666 e[tex]^{-t/120}[/tex] micro Amps, where 66.67 micro Amps is due to the 8 v source and - 16.666 e[tex]^{-t/120}[/tex] source due to the capacitorMy question is that if we use superposition instead, should the current due to the 8 v source and the capacitor be added since both send current towards R11 in the same direction?Thank you in advanceP.S since this is more a theoretical question, i thought best i post it here other than the Homework section
 

Attachments

  • Capture1.JPG
    Capture1.JPG
    88.7 KB · Views: 795
Physics news on Phys.org
ecy5maa said:
Hello,

The circuit attached below is from Richard Dorfs Intro to Electric Circuits book. The switch is shut for a long time and opened at t=0.

The question asks to find the i(t) across R11, which they use nodal analaysis and find it to be 66.67 - 16.666 e[tex]^{-t/120}[/tex] micro Amps, where 66.67 micro Amps is due to the 8 v source and - 16.666 e[tex]^{-t/120}[/tex] source due to the capacitor


My question is that if we use superposition instead, should the current due to the 8 v source and the capacitor be added since both send current towards R11 in the same direction?


Thank you in advance


P.S since this is more a theoretical question, i thought best i post it here other than the Homework section

First, I think when the switch open, Cap is not going to send current to R11 in the same direction as the 8V battery. Because if you use super position to find the voltage at probe11 when the switch is closed, the voltage is lower than when the switch is open for a long time. The final voltage at this point will be 4V after the switch opened for a long time and let everything settle.

I have not think in detail how to do the calculation, but super position definitely will work. My guess is to treat the cap as a variable voltage source that slowly rise from initial voltage, with the time constant of RC where R = R10 and R11 in parallel and you have to calculate the thev. voltage or something like that to the final voltage of 4V. As I said, I am too lazy to go into the detail, but the answer is yes, you have to include the cap. until the circuit settle.
 
Last edited:
Yungman

I made a mistake above. The current due to the capacitor is 16.666 eLaTeX Code: ^{-t/120} not - 16.666 eLaTeX Code: ^{-t/120}.

However in the book instead of adding the current...they are subtracting them. This is what i don't get since both currents ( current due to the 8V voltage source and current due to the capacitor) are in the same direction

So shouldn't it be added and hence shouldn't the answer be 66.67 + 16.666 eLaTeX Code: ^{-t/120} and not 66.67 - 16.666 eLaTeX Code: ^{-t/120}
Any help in this regard will be helpful...Also i don't have the book with me but the answer is correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
11K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K