Solving Apparent Paradox: Collision of Two Bodies

  • Thread starter Thread starter damitr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paradox
AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses the collision of two bodies, m1 and m2, where m2 is at rest and m1 moves with velocity v1, resulting in them sticking together post-collision. Using conservation of momentum, the final velocity V is calculated as V=(m1/(m1+m2))v1, while conservation of energy yields V=sqrt(m1/(m1+m2))v1, leading to conflicting results. The apparent paradox arises from the naive application of these principles, as kinetic energy is not conserved in inelastic collisions. The conclusion emphasizes that the collision is inelastic, and thus, conservation of momentum is the correct approach. Ultimately, the discussion clarifies that there is no paradox when the principles are applied correctly.
damitr
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Consider collision of two bodies of mass m1 and m2. m2 is at rest whicle m1 moves with velocity v1.
When they collide they sitck together. The question is what is the final velocity V of the two bodies combined.
This apparently simple problem if solved naively leads to an apparent paradox if we solve the problem by
1. conservation of momentum
2. conservation of energy

1.

By conservation of momentum
m1v1+m2v2=(m1+m2)V
since v2=0 we get the final velocity V of the two bodies combined as

V=(m1/(m1+m2))v1


2.

By conservation of energy
(m1v1^2)/2 + (m2v2^2)/2 = ((m1+m2)V^2)/2
here again by substituting v2=0 we get

V= sqrt(m1/(m1+m2))v1

so if we go by two different routes we arrive at two different answers, whereas we should be arriving at the same answer.
So which one is correct?
I know I have applied the concepts very naively, if I am wrong at any point of these derivatiosn please point me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no paradox. When there is a 'stick', this is always an inelastic collision. KE is not conserved.

Zz.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top