Solving Apparent Paradox: Collision of Two Bodies

  • Thread starter Thread starter damitr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paradox
AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses the collision of two bodies, m1 and m2, where m2 is at rest and m1 moves with velocity v1, resulting in them sticking together post-collision. Using conservation of momentum, the final velocity V is calculated as V=(m1/(m1+m2))v1, while conservation of energy yields V=sqrt(m1/(m1+m2))v1, leading to conflicting results. The apparent paradox arises from the naive application of these principles, as kinetic energy is not conserved in inelastic collisions. The conclusion emphasizes that the collision is inelastic, and thus, conservation of momentum is the correct approach. Ultimately, the discussion clarifies that there is no paradox when the principles are applied correctly.
damitr
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Consider collision of two bodies of mass m1 and m2. m2 is at rest whicle m1 moves with velocity v1.
When they collide they sitck together. The question is what is the final velocity V of the two bodies combined.
This apparently simple problem if solved naively leads to an apparent paradox if we solve the problem by
1. conservation of momentum
2. conservation of energy

1.

By conservation of momentum
m1v1+m2v2=(m1+m2)V
since v2=0 we get the final velocity V of the two bodies combined as

V=(m1/(m1+m2))v1


2.

By conservation of energy
(m1v1^2)/2 + (m2v2^2)/2 = ((m1+m2)V^2)/2
here again by substituting v2=0 we get

V= sqrt(m1/(m1+m2))v1

so if we go by two different routes we arrive at two different answers, whereas we should be arriving at the same answer.
So which one is correct?
I know I have applied the concepts very naively, if I am wrong at any point of these derivatiosn please point me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no paradox. When there is a 'stick', this is always an inelastic collision. KE is not conserved.

Zz.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top