Solving Complex Gaussian Integral Problems

Pacopag
Messages
193
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


We know that
\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-ax^2}dx = \sqrt{\pi \over a}.

Does this hold even if a is complex?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


In the derivation of the above equation, I don't see any reason why we must assume that a be real. So I think it does hold for complex a.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
benorin said:
It holds for Re(a)>0.

Yes … it relies on e^{-ax^2}\arrowvert_{\infty}\,=\,0 .

If a = b + ic, then e^{-ax^2}=\,e^{-bx^2}e^{-icx^2} , which is 0 if b > 0, and really wobbly if b ≤ 0. :smile:
 
Great. Thank you for your replies.
 
Hi again. I'd just like to make a remark that is bothering me. I created this thread because I was trying to find a Green function and arrived at
G(x,x',t) = {1\over{2\pi}}e^{im(x-x')\over{2t}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-{it\over{2m}}\left(p-{m(x-x')\over t}\right)^2}.
Please ignore everything except the integral.
When I naiively use the gaussian integral formula in my original post, I get the correct answer. But according to what you said, I should not be able to do this since (i.e. Re(a)<0) in this case. Can you see any reason for this?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top