Solving Coulomb Barrier Penetrability with a Confusing Formula

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the formula for calculating the probability of protons penetrating the Coulomb barrier, specifically the equation Probability = exp[(- (EG/E))^0.5]. The user is confused about how to correctly apply the formula with given values of EG (Gamow energy) as 493 keV and E as 2 eV, leading to a negative number when calculating. The main issue is the order of operations, as the user initially attempts to take the square root of a negative number, which is not possible. The correct approach is to first divide EG by E, then take the square root of the negative result, and finally apply the exponential function. The user ultimately resolves the confusion and shares the correct method for solving the problem.
daleklama
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There isn't an exact problem I'm struggling with, it's one small part of a larger problem, which involves finding the probability protons will penetrate the Coulomb barrier.

I'm trying to understand an example in my notes, and the bit that confuses me is attached as an image file.

Homework Equations



The equation is shown in the attachment, and I know it's correct.

Probability = exp [ (- (EG/E)) ^ 0.5]

The Attempt at a Solution



Basically what I don't understand is simple - how the answer was found using the formula.

EG (Gamow energy) is 493 kev, E is 2 ev, but when those are subbed into the formula, my notes say you should get 1.5 x 10 ^ 7.

When I try to work it out on my calculator, it says error.

I firstly divide - EG/E, get a negative number = - 246.5
Then I try to put it to the power of a half (same as taking the square root) and I can't, because it's a minus number. I know you can't perform that operation with a minus number.
And then you're supposed to take the exponential, but I haven't managed to put it to the power of a half yet!

How on Earth does this formula work? The number you're trying to put to the power of a half is always going to be negative! :(

I'm stumped!

Hope the attachment works okay, thank you for any help.
 

Attachments

  • whatdoesthismean.jpg
    whatdoesthismean.jpg
    7.1 KB · Views: 499
Physics news on Phys.org


Apologies, I've solved it!

If anyone wants to know the solution:

With that kind of equation, you're supposed to divide first, THEN put it to the power of a half, THEN add in the minus sign, THEN take the exponential.

Sorry guys!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top