Solving Dielectric Field Problem: Infinite Charged Plane with Two Dielectrics

  • Thread starter Thread starter rbtqwt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dielectrics
rbtqwt
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi. I have a problem in trying to find the field \vec E in the following situation:
I have an infinite charged plane, with charge density \sigma, and two dielectrics, like in picture:
http://img53.imageshack.us/img53/2301/testrb0.jpg
Now, if i think of \vec D being orthogonal to the charged plane, using Gauss law i get \vec D = \frac{\sigma}{2} \vec k, then i get the fields \vec Ein the dielectrics: \vec E_1 = \frac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon_0 k_1} \vec k and \vec E_2 = \frac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon_0 k_2} \vec k.. but, because of \oint \vec E \cdot d\vec x = 0, I obtain E_{t_1} = E_{t_2} , where E_{t_i} is the tangential (to the contact surface of dielectrics) component of \vec E in dielectric i. But E_{t_1} = \|\vec E_1}\| \ne \|\vec E_2\| = E_{t_2}.

What is wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


The basic equation is E1=E2. Then find D1 and D2. There will be a sigma1 and silgma2.
 


In the problem \sigma is fixed :shy:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top