Solving Eigenket Homework: Show A† Has Eigenbra <a*| to Eigenvalue a*

  • Thread starter Thread starter ConeOfIce
  • Start date Start date
ConeOfIce
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that if an operator A has an eigenket |a> to eigenvalue a then
the adjoint operator A† has an eigenbra <a*| to eigenvalue a*. How
is <a*| related to |a>?


Homework Equations


A|a> = |a>a
| >† = < |


The Attempt at a Solution


I actually have no clue where to start this question. I am guessing it has something to do with A† would have an eigenket of |a>†. But I am unsure if this is correct at all.
Would anyone be able to help me get started.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ConeOfIce said:

Homework Statement


Show that if an operator A has an eigenket |a> to eigenvalue a then
the adjoint operator A† has an eigenbra <a*| to eigenvalue a*. How
is <a*| related to |a>?


Homework Equations


A|a> = |a>a
| >† = < |


The Attempt at a Solution


I actually have no clue where to start this question. I am guessing it has something to do with A† would have an eigenket of |a>†. But I am unsure if this is correct at all.
Would anyone be able to help me get started.

Take the dagger of (A |a>) This must be equal to the dagger of (a |a>).
 
nrqed said:
Take the dagger of (A |a>) This must be equal to the dagger of (a |a>).

Ok, I do this. And I also took the dagge of both sides of the equation. So I got
(A|a>)^(dagger) = (|a>a)^dagger which gets

<a|A* = a*<a|.

And using your statement form above I then do
A*<a| = a|a> .
How does this get me any closer to the answer?
 
ConeOfIce said:
Ok, I do this. And I also took the dagge of both sides of the equation. So I got
(A|a>)^(dagger) = (|a>a)^dagger which gets

<a|A* = a*<a|.
So you are done! You have proved that <a| is an eigenbra of A* with eigenvalue a*!
And using your statement form above I then do
A*<a| = a|a> .
How does this get me any closer to the answer?
?:confused: What statement from above? I did not say anything lik ethat!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top