Solving Flux of Electric Field through a Cube of Side L = 2m

  • Thread starter Thread starter ibaraku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube Flux
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric flux through a cube with a given electric field. The total flux through the cube is determined by summing the contributions from each face, using the equation phi total = (E * n) delta A. Participants clarify that the flux is calculated using the dot product of the electric field vector and the normal vector for each face. It is emphasized that the flux will be zero for faces where the electric field is perpendicular, and the total flux through the cube sums to zero due to symmetry. The final goal is to find the individual flux values for each face rather than just the total.
ibaraku
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cube of side L = 2m is centered at the origin, with the coordinate axes perpendicular to its faces. Find the flux of the electric field E = (15N/C)i + (27N/C)j + (39N/C)k through each face of the cube


Homework Equations



phi total = (E * n) delta A


The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, so I know that
phi total = phi 1 + phi 2 + ... + phi 6

what I am confused about is how do I know where the flux is parallel to the faces of cube, where is it zero?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ibaraku said:

Homework Statement


A cube of side L = 2m is centered at the origin, with the coordinate axes perpendicular to its faces. Find the flux of the electric field E = (15N/C)i + (27N/C)j + (39N/C)k through each face of the cube


Homework Equations



phi total = (E * n) delta A


The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, so I know that
phi total = phi 1 + phi 2 + ... + phi 6

what I am confused about is how do I know where the flux is parallel to the faces of cube, where is it zero?

Thanks

(E*n) is the dot product between \vec{E} and \hat{n}. You are given \vec{E}, so what is the defintion of \hat{n} for any surface? What is \hat{n} for each surface of the cube? Once you find these, you just compute the dot product and then integrate over the area of each surface to get your phis.
 
gabbagabbahey said:
(E*n) is the dot product between \vec{E} and \hat{n}. You are given \vec{E}, so what is the defintion of \hat{n} for any surface? What is \hat{n} for each surface of the cube? Once you find these, you just compute the dot product and then integrate over the area of each surface to get your phis.

Yeah I get that
[((15N/C)i + (27N/C)j + (39N/C)k] . i = (15N/C) a^2
"" "" "" "" . -i = -(15N/C) a^2
...
...

I am just wondering how do I know where one of this calculations will be zero, where will the flux be parallel to the sides of the cube, how do I recognize that?
 
ibaraku said:
Yeah I get that
[((15N/C)i + (27N/C)j + (39N/C)k] . i = (15N/C) a^2
"" "" "" "" . -i = -(15N/C) a^2
...
...

I am just wondering how do I know where one of this calculations will be zero, where will the flux be parallel to the sides of the cube, how do I recognize that?
Flux is a scalar quantity...it will be neither parallel nor perpendicular to any given side. Why do you have an a^2 there? And for which face is \hat{n}=+\hat{i}?Is it the same for all faces? Can you show your whole solution?
 
gabbagabbahey said:
What is \hat{i} \cdot \hat{i}, how about \hat{i} \cdot \hat{j} and \hat{i} \cdot \hat{k}?

1, 0, 0

I see, so for this problem

[(15N/C)a^2 + (-15N/C)a^2 + (27N/C)a^2 + (-27N/C)a^2 + (39N/C)a^2 + (-39N/C)a^2] = 0

Thanks
 
ibaraku said:
1, 0, 0

I see, so for this problem

[(15N/C)a^2 + (-15N/C)a^2 + (27N/C)a^2 + (-27N/C)a^2 + (39N/C)a^2 + (-39N/C)a^2] = 0

Thanks

If by a you mean L, then yes but you have calculated the TOTAL flux. The question asks for the flux through each side. You should draw a diagram, where you label each side and give the flux through each side.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top