Solving for Acceleration on a Parabolic Path | Physics Tutorial

  • Thread starter Thread starter Drill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Parabola
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating acceleration for an object moving along a parabolic path described by the equation y(x) = ax^2. Unlike a frictionless ramp where acceleration is constant, the acceleration in this case varies and is determined by the tangent of the parabola at the object's position, represented by the first derivative y' = 2ax. Participants seek clarification on the formula for the acceleration vector, expressed as a combination of tangential and normal components. A link to additional resources is provided for further understanding of the equations involved. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of motion along a parabolic trajectory and the need for precise calculations.
Drill
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody



we know that if we have an object sliding on a frictionless ramp,

the acceleration force will be constant, and it equals to

a=g * sin(theta)
where theta is the ramp angle w.r.t. the ground


so the path of motion in this problem can be written mathematically as a linear function
y(x)=bx
and hence the tangent tan(theta)= bx /x =b


The Question is
if the path of motion is parabolic and is of the form

y(x) = a x^2

how to solve for the acceleration with respect to time ??

be aware that ,in this case the acceleration is not constant , and it always equals to the tangent of the parabola at the current location of the object.
and the tangent in this case is the first derivative of y which is
y'=2ax

as we see the tangent and hence the acceleration is a function of x

so ,

how to calculate the time as the function of position ??

thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Using n-t coordinates you'd get that the acceleration vector is

\vec{a}=\dot{v} \hat{e_t}+ \frac{v^2}{\rho} \hat{e_n}

where

\rho =\frac{(1+(y')^2)^\frac{3}{2}}{y''}


Not sure if I wrote down the formula for ρ correctly though.

then again, for a time parameter x=t.
 
Hi

and thanks for replying

but can you explaine how this equation came about

\vec{a}=\dot{v} \hat{e_t}+ \frac{v^2}{\rho} \hat{e_n}

or at least show me the source link
 
Drill said:
Hi

and thanks for replying

but can you explaine how this equation came about

\vec{a}=\dot{v} \hat{e_t}+ \frac{v^2}{\rho} \hat{e_n}

or at least show me the source link

read http://web.mst.edu/~reflori/be150/FloriNotes/ntCoordLectureNotes1.htm"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks :)


rock.freak667 said:
read http://web.mst.edu/~reflori/be150/FloriNotes/ntCoordLectureNotes1.htm"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top