Solving for Angular Acceleration & Speed of Rod in Freefall

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular acceleration and speed of a uniform rod in freefall from a vertical position. The initial calculations for angular speed and acceleration were incorrect due to the assumption of constant angular acceleration. The correct approach involves using torque equations, with the force acting at the center of mass, which is located at half the length of the rod (0.5m). The recalculated angular acceleration is found to be 29.4 rad/s² after applying the correct radius. The final angular speed as the rod passes through the vertical is determined to be 10.84 rad/s, confirming the importance of accurately identifying the point of application of forces.
Juniper7
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a uniform rod of mass 12kg and length 1.0m. At its end, the rod is attached to a fixed, friction-free pivot. Initially the rod is balanced vertically above the pivot and begins to fall (from rest) as shown in the diagram. Determine,
a) the angular acceleration of the rod as it passes through the horizontal at B.
b) the angular speed of the rod as it passes through the vertical at C.

Homework Equations


PE = mgh
KE = 1/2Iω2
Irod = 1/3ml2
ω2 = ωo2 + 2αθ


The Attempt at a Solution


a) PE = KE
mgh = 1/2Iω2
(12kg)(9.81m/s2)(1.0m) = (0.5)(1/3)(12kg)(1.0m)ω2
ω = 7.668rad/s
Can I use the length of the rod as its height?

ω2 = ωo2 + 2αθ
(7.668)2 = 2α90° (90° = 1.571rad)
α = 18.7rad/s2
is that right?

b) ω2 = ωo2 + 2αθ
ω2 = (7.668rad/s)2 + 2(18.7rad/s2)(1.571rad)
assumptions: the α will stay the same and I'm trying to calculate from point B to C so θ = 90°
ω = 10.84rad/s

Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-05-26 at 6.28.53 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-05-26 at 6.28.53 PM.png
    975 bytes · Views: 549
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the center of mass of the rod.
 
Juniper7 said:
a) PE = KE
mgh = 1/2Iω2
(12kg)(9.81m/s2)(1.0m) = (0.5)(1/3)(12kg)(1.0m)ω2
ω = 7.668rad/s
Can I use the length of the rod as its height?

ω2 = ωo2 + 2αθ
(7.668)2 = 2α90° (90° = 1.571rad)
α = 18.7rad/s2
is that right?

b) ω2 = ωo2 + 2αθ
ω2 = (7.668rad/s)2 + 2(18.7rad/s2)(1.571rad)
assumptions: the α will stay the same and I'm trying to calculate from point B to C so θ = 90°
ω = 10.84rad/s

This is incorrect .

The relation in red is applicable when the angular acceleration is constant which is not the case in this problem.

Write torque equation for the rod when it is horizontal.
 
Last edited:
Tanya Sharma said:
This is incorrect .

The relation in red is applicable when the angular acceleration is constant which is not the case in this problem.

Write torque equation for the rod when it is horizontal.

Ok, so:

τ = Iα
τ = 1/3ml2α

τ = rF
F = mg
τ = rmg
rmg = 1/3ml2α
(1.0m)(12kg)(9.81m/s2) = (1/3)(12kg)(1m)2α
α = 29.4rad/s2
This seems rather high...

would the radius of the rod be its length because it is pivoting on its end? I think i did something wrong... thanks for the help
 
Juniper7 said:
would the radius of the rod be its length because it is pivoting on its end?

1) What is the point of application of the force mg which is producing the torque about the pivot ?
2) What is the distance between this point of application and the pivot ?
 
Tanya Sharma said:
1) What is the point of application of the force mg which is producing the torque about the pivot ?
2) What is the distance between this point of application and the pivot ?

1) Would that be at the end of the rod, the opposite end of the pivot?
2) if the point of application is the end, then it would be 1.0 m and the radius should be 1.0m, right?
 
Juniper7 said:
1) Would that be at the end of the rod, the opposite end of the pivot?
2) if the point of application is the end, then it would be 1.0 m and the radius should be 1.0m, right?

No.

Where does weight of a body act ?
 
Tanya Sharma said:
No.

Where does weight of a body act ?

Oh, the centre of mass? so the radius would be half of the length, 0.5m, right?
 
Juniper7 said:
Oh, the centre of mass? so the radius would be half of the length, 0.5m, right?

Correct.
 
  • #10
Thank you!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top