Solving for (β+1) in Thevenin Equivalent Homework

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the origin of the (β+1) term in the context of Thevenin equivalent circuits, specifically for a common emitter BJT amplifier. Participants clarify that the term arises from factoring the equation (β + 1)i + is = 0, which relates the collector and emitter currents. The confusion stems from substituting values incorrectly, as the substitution must not include the variable being solved for. The correct approach involves isolating the current and substituting it properly into the expression for vth. Overall, the key takeaway is the importance of careful algebraic manipulation when dealing with circuit equations.
nunez2005
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm trying to understand where the (β+1) comes from.


2. Homework Equations
vth=-βiR2
i+βi+is=0

vth=-β(-is/(β+1))R2


3. The Attempt at a Solution

vth=-βiR2
i+βi+is=0

vth=-β(-βi-is)R2
 

Attachments

  • problem.png
    problem.png
    5.8 KB · Views: 495
Physics news on Phys.org
nunez2005 said:

Homework Statement


I'm trying to understand where the (β+1) comes from.


2. Homework Equations
vth=-βiR2
i+βi+is=0

vth=-β(-is/(β+1))R2


3. The Attempt at a Solution

vth=-βiR2
i+βi+is=0

vth=-β(-βi-is)R2


Welcome to the PF.

Without seeing the original circuit that this is modeling, it's hard to be sure. But for a CE BJT amplifier, your collector current Ic = β * Ib. So your emitter current is...
 
i've attached the solution that i have in the book, the value of beta is 150 and R1=100k and R2=39k, the only problem I have is that how do you get to the vth while substituting beta and the resistance in both sides to be equal to -Beta (-is/beta+1), the beta + 1 has to come out from simplying and combining like terms but I just can't see it.
 
nunez2005 said:

Homework Statement


I'm trying to understand where the (β+1) comes from.


2. Homework Equations
vth=-βiR2
i+βi+is=0

vth=-β(-is/(β+1))R2


3. The Attempt at a Solution

vth=-βiR2
i+βi+is=0

So factor out the i in that equation above:

(β + 1)i + is = 0

There's your (β + 1) term.

vth=-β(-βi-is)R2

That doesn't look right. You want to substitute for i in your equation for Vth from above, but what you've stuck in there also contains i.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
11K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top