Solving for DeltaX in a Quantum Well: Uncertainty Principle and Energy Analysis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a quantum mechanics problem related to a quantum well, where the objective is to determine the width (DeltaX) for which the total energy of an electron is zero. The potential energy inside the well is -1.0 eV, while outside it is 0 eV. The uncertainty principle is applied to find DeltaX, with the participant initially estimating it around 10^-11 but expressing uncertainty about the correctness of this value. Additionally, the participant notes the absence of the electron's mass in the problem, raising questions about alternative approaches to the solution. The thread highlights the complexity of quantum mechanics and the need for collaborative problem-solving in academic settings.
D__grant
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



-This is a problem on my practice final that I haven't been able to solve. Hoping someone out there can take a crack & clarify it for me.

Quantum wells are devices which can be used to trap electrons in semiconductors. If the electron is in the well it has a lower energy than if it is outside, so it tends to stay in the well. Suppose we have a quantum well which has a width of DeltaX and a depth of 1.0 eV , i.e. if the electron is in the well it has a potential energy of -1.0 eV and if it is outside it has a potential energy of 0 eV. Use the uncertainty principle to find the value of DeltaX for which total energy kinetic & potential of an electron in the well is zero.
Note: This is the smallest size well we can have because if deltaX is any smaller, the total energy of the electron in the well will be bigger than zero, and escape.



Homework Equations


1. E=KE+PE
2. Vo= -1 eV
3. Total Energy > 1/2m x (h/2piDeltaX)^2 - Vo

The Attempt at a Solution



I set the Total Energy=0 and attempted to solve for deltaX. My first solution was the the order of 10^-11 but I doubt I answered it correctly. Also, the mass of an electron was not given on the exam so I'm wondering if there's a different path to take. Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone care to take a shot at this? I'm desperate for help & I'm not sure why no one's attempted it. I read the stickies & tried following the forum's conventions as best I could...

thank you all
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top