Solving for Electric Potential Energy , given 4 point charges of equal value

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential energy (EPE) of four identical point charges placed at the corners of a square. Each charge is +4.0 mC, and the side length of the square is 0.30 m. The initial approach used the formula V = kq/r to find the potential, but the result was in volts instead of joules. To find the total EPE, the correct formula U_E = k(q1*q2)/r must be applied for each pair of charges, summing the contributions from all interactions. Ultimately, the potential energy is determined by considering the interactions between all pairs of charges.
cgaleb
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Four point charges are individually brought from infinity and placed at the corners of a square whose sides are 0.30 m each. Each charge has the identical value + 4.0 mC. What is the electric potential energy of these four charges?

Homework Equations



V=kq/r (or at least this is the equation I have been attempting to use to solve this)
k= 9 x 10^9 Nm^2/C^2
q= 4 x 10^-6 C
r= 3.0 m

The Attempt at a Solution



[(9x10^9)(4x10^-6)]/.3=1.2X10^5

Since all charges are the same I take that answer multiply by four to get the sum, which gives me 4.8x10^5 V.

However, the answer is in V and I need an answer in Joules (J). So I am assuming I am not even using the correct equation to solve for EPE. I'm sure if I could figure out what equation to use to solve for EPE in Joules, I could do the math. My problem is not knowing what equation to use to solve the problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know the equation U_E = qV?
 
Yeah, I actually came across that a few minutes ago and tried to plug in what I knew.
which would give me UE=qV, or (4x10^-6)(4.8x10^5)=1.92 Joules.

I plugged in the answer for V that I got before, and used the given charge.

Does this sound right?
 
hmm I don't think so. Consider this: if a charge is brought from infinity to one of the corners of the square, that charge gains potential energy due to the presence of all the other charges. That means that the total potential energy will be the sum of energies between q1 and q2, q1 and q3, q2 and q3, q1 and q4, q2 and q4, and q3 and q4 (where q1-4 are the charges). Note that U_E = qV = \frac{k q_1q_2}{r}
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top