Solving for energy involving hyperbolic

  • Thread starter Thread starter nick227
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Hyperbolic
nick227
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What energy (in eV) should a beam of electrons have so that 0.1% of them are able to tunnel through a barrier of height 7.0eV and 1.0 nm wide? Start with the equation for T(E) and set it up with 1/T(E) on one side and let E/U=x for the unknown. Solve the equation for x and then E.


Homework Equations



T(E) (1+.25(U2/(E(U-E)))sinh2(\alphaL))

\alpha = ((2m(U-E))1/2)/h


The Attempt at a Solution



I get
0=x-x2-.25sinh2(\alphaL)

this is after I make E/U=x. How can i solve for x and then solve for E?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried to look for a numerical solution?

EDIT: If you need to solve it analytically, you may need to rewrite the hyperbolic sine term another way:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbolic_tangent#Standard_algebraic_expressions

I actually derived this whole equation once. It required the use of an alternate expression for the hyperbolic sine term.

The numerical solution seems easiest.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top