Solving for Exact Fit Cubic Polynomial Parameters

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around fitting a cubic polynomial to a set of data points, specifically addressing the challenges of having only three data points while needing four coefficients for a general cubic polynomial. Participants are exploring the implications of this limitation and the relationships between the coefficients.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the initial attempts at deriving a cubic polynomial from given data points, noting the mathematical relationships between coefficients. There is a focus on the implications of having insufficient data points to determine all coefficients uniquely.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to express the coefficients in terms of a free parameter, while others are questioning the correctness of their approaches and the implications of their findings. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between the coefficients and the conditions imposed by the data points.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of having only three data points, which limits their ability to determine all four coefficients of the cubic polynomial. There is also mention of a potential misunderstanding regarding the requirements of the problem and the expected form of the solution.

ShaunDiel
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


4ig5sl.jpg



The Attempt at a Solution


For Part A) I did the normal best fit straight line stuff, A^τAX=bA^τ etc, resulting in:
y= 31/26x -8/3

Now part B) is where I need a hand, I started with just cubing, squaring etc the terms given and doing row ops, which is where I'm at now. It just seems like it's getting too ugly and I'm not sure where I'm going with it.

4g6gdc.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is that you have only three data points, but need 4 points to fit a general cubic. I have not checked your working above in detail, but you end up with the conditions -10c + 2d = 3, or c = (1/5)d-(3/10) = 0.2d - 0.3. Then -3b + 8c 6d = -124, so you can get b in terms of d, etc. Altogether, you will have one free parameter, d, in your fit, and the question is asking why you cannot have all four coefficients a,b,c,d integer at the same time.

RGV
 
Ray Vickson said:
The problem is that you have only three data points, but need 4 points to fit a general cubic. I have not checked your working above in detail, but you end up with the conditions -10c + 2d = 3, or c = (1/5)d-(3/10) = 0.2d - 0.3. Then -3b + 8c 6d = -124, so you can get b in terms of d, etc. Altogether, you will have one free parameter, d, in your fit, and the question is asking why you cannot have all four coefficients a,b,c,d integer at the same time.

RGV


I still don't really understand where I'm supposed to go :confused:

I have legitimately no idea
 
I emailed my prof about the question, asking him if the final cubic:

( (11/8+1019/16)x^3 + x^2 + (8/3+123/3)x+(-5-3/2)=0)

Was as incorrect as it looked.

He replied with this:

"You should get a row of zeros in your equation, giving you a homogeneous solution which is a cubic polynomial and a particular solution which can be either cubic or quadratic. Your homogeneous solution should have a certain factorised form which you should expect."
 
Go back and read the problem again! It says "What is the general equation of all cubic polynomials". As Ray Vickson told you, the general cubic involves 4 coefficients- [itex]y= ax^3+ bx^2+ cx+ d[/itex]- while you have only three conditions to satisfy. You can use the three equations you get by putting the three values of x and y into that equation into solve for any three of a, b, c, and d in terms of the fourth. Different values of that fourth coefficient will give different cubic polynomials out of the infinite number that satisfy that.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Go back and read the problem again! It says "What is the general equation of all cubic polynomials". As Ray Vickson told you, the general cubic involves 4 coefficients- [itex]y= ax^3+ bx^2+ cx+ d[/itex]- while you have only three conditions to satisfy. You can use the three equations you get by putting the three values of x and y into that equation into solve for any three of a, b, c, and d in terms of the fourth. Different values of that fourth coefficient will give different cubic polynomials out of the infinite number that satisfy that.

Right, I understand that much, I just feel like I'm taking the wrong approach completely to starting this.

I'm completely screwed now since nothing I did was right
 
The final row in your next to last matrix in post 1 (I don't believe your final step accomplishes anything) is equivalent to -10c- 2d= 3 which is equivalent to 2d= -3- 10c and gives d= (-3/2)- 5c. The second row is equivalent to -3b+ 8c= -124 which is equivalent to 3b= 8c- 124 and so b= (8/3)c+ 124/3. The first row is equivalent to 24a- 20c+ 3d= -514. Putting the previous values into that, 24a- 20((8/3)c- 124/3)+ 3((-3/2)- 5c)= -514. Solve that for a so you have a, b, and c in terms of d. Finally write [itex]y= ax^3+ bx^2+ cx+ d[/itex] using those so you have the "general" cubic polynomial in terms of the parameter d.
 
HallsofIvy said:
The final row in your next to last matrix in post 1 (I don't believe your final step accomplishes anything) is equivalent to -10c- 2d= 3 which is equivalent to 2d= -3- 10c and gives d= (-3/2)- 5c. The second row is equivalent to -3b+ 8c= -124 which is equivalent to 3b= 8c- 124 and so b= (8/3)c+ 124/3. The first row is equivalent to 24a- 20c+ 3d= -514. Putting the previous values into that, 24a- 20((8/3)c- 124/3)+ 3((-3/2)- 5c)= -514. Solve that for a so you have a, b, and c in terms of d. Finally write [itex]y= ax^3+ bx^2+ cx+ d[/itex] using those so you have the "general" cubic polynomial in terms of the parameter d.


Okay sweet, I'm working this out now, I think you skimmed over the stuff that I worked out because I did a column swap so basically everywhere you have a c it should be a b.

But where I am right now, I have:

d=(-3/2)-5b
c=(8/3)b+124/3
b=(-3/10)-(1/5)d

So If I plug them into the first row I'll have 24a-20((-3/10)-(1/5)d)) +3((-3/2)-5b)?

What did my prof mean about the row of zeros? That's making me think I messed up my row ops somwhere
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K