Solving for h in Terms of r for Uniform Solid

AI Thread Summary
To find the height h of the cone in terms of the radius r of the hemisphere and cone, one must analyze the equilibrium conditions of the composite solid. The solid can maintain equilibrium as long as any point on the curved surface of the hemisphere is in contact with a horizontal plane, indicating the importance of the center of gravity's position. The center of gravity must lie along the line of symmetry due to the symmetry of the composite body, and the weight's line of action must coincide with the normal reaction force for rotational equilibrium. Understanding the geometry of the setup and considering various angles of inclination will help in determining the exact position of the center of gravity. Ultimately, a detailed analysis of forces and moments is necessary to derive h in terms of r accurately.
garyljc
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
Question :
A uniform solid consists of a hemisphere of radius r and a right circular cone of base radius r and height h , fixed together so that their plane faces coincide . The solid can rest in equilibrium with any point of the curved surface of the hemisphere in contact with a horizontal plane.Find h in terms of r.

My working :
1. I find the mass of the cone and the hemisphere.
2. Centre of mass of the cone and the hemisphere
3. tabulate it and find the centre of the mass of the composite body.

Problem :
After find x bar of the composite body , i have no idea how to find h in terms of r . I do not understand what information they are giving me when they say that "The solid can rest in equilibrium with any point of the curved surface of the hemisphere in contact with a horizontal plane" .

Could anyone help me out . Thanks .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
garyljc said:
"The solid can rest in equilibrium with any point of the curved surface of the hemisphere in contact with a horizontal plane" .
Imagine placing this body on a table top. The object will not fall over so long as the curved surface of the hemisphere remains in contact with the table.
 
I still don't get it . Do I use moments to find h in terms of r ?

I've already thought about it ... but then ... there's will be a lot of positions the body will be in equilibrium so as long as the curved surface is in contact with the plane . But what information does it tells us ? R=mg ?
 
In solving this question, you need to study the geometry of the set-up.

Consider, what is the angle between the table top and the normal reaction force on the composite body ?

Note that due to the symmetry present in the composite body, its centre of gravity must lie somewhere on the line of symmetry.

Also, for rotational equilibrium to occur, the lines of action of the weight of the body and the normal reaction force must coincide, or else a net moment will be generated.
 
Last edited:
but since the plane in horizontal , the weight will act downwards along the line of symmetry as well right ?
 
"but since the plane in horizontal, the weight will act downwards along the line of symmetry as well right?"

Yes, if the body is placed "vertically" on the table (i.e. with its line of symmetry perpendicular to the table).

However, analyzing such a situation only tells you that the position of the centre of gravity (CG) is SOMEWHERE on the line of symmetry. You need the exact position of the CG to be able to express h in terms of r.

To determine the exact position of the CG, consider this statement: "The solid can rest in equilibrium with any point of the curved surface of the hemisphere in contact with a horizontal plane (the table)".

Let's now consider the situation where the composite body is slanted (i.e. the line of symmetry of the body makes an angle with the table). Even in such a situation, the body can remain in equilibrium. Sketch the forces acting on the body, and remember that "for rotational equilibrium to occur, the lines of action of the weight and the normal reaction force must coincide". What can you conclude about the position of the CG?
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

Similar threads

Back
Top