Solving for Speed of Extreme Skier Descending Mountain

  • Thread starter Thread starter rcmango
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed
AI Thread Summary
An extreme skier descends a 25° slope with a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.200 before jumping off a cliff, landing 3.70 m below. The problem involves three stages: acceleration down the ramp, deceleration on the horizontal, and free fall. Friction must be accounted for, as it reduces the kinetic energy derived from gravitational potential energy. The skier's velocity at the cliff's edge is calculated by subtracting the work done by friction from the gravitational potential energy. The final velocity before landing incorporates both horizontal and vertical components due to the skier's trajectory.
rcmango
Messages
232
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An extreme skier, starting from rest, coasts down a mountain that makes an angle 25.0° with the horizontal. The coefficient of kinetic friction between her skis and the snow is 0.200. She coasts for a distance of 12.3 m before coming to the edge of a cliff. Without slowing down, she skis off the cliff and lands downhill at a point whose vertical distance is 3.70 m below the edge. How fast is she going just before she lands?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


W = KEf -KE0
(1/2mv^2 - 1/2m* v^20)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Conservation of energy does not apply when there is friction unless you include the heat generated by the friction.

To solve this problem you need to use the friction.

It's a 3 stage problem and only the last can be solved by conservation of energy: 1) an acceleration down ramp 2) a deceleration along the horizontal from bottom of ramp to edge of cliff and 3) a vertical acceleration while horizontal velocity is unchanged.
 
Well from the distance traveled and the angle, one can determine the change in elevation of the skier on the mountain. If the snow was frictionless, then this change in elevation (change in gravitational potential energy, GPE) would be transformed into kinetic energy (conservation of energy). However, there is a dissipative force - friction - which does work against the skier, so this work has to be subtracted from the GPE to find the KE at the point where the skier leaves the cliff. Knowing the KE, one determines the velocity, which is the initial velocity for the second part of the problem where the skier is in free fall for 3.7 m.

Note that since the skier's velocity is at 25° with respect to horizontal, there is both a horizontal and vertical component to the velocity.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top