Solving Friction Problem: Acceleration of Lower Block

  • Thread starter Thread starter crazy_nuttie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration of a lower block subjected to a force and friction. The problem involves two blocks with given masses and a coefficient of kinetic friction. The user sets up free body diagrams and equations for both blocks but struggles to incorporate the friction between them correctly. There is confusion regarding the net forces acting on the blocks and how to express the frictional forces in the equations. The user seeks clarification on the correct formulation to find the acceleration of the lower block.
crazy_nuttie
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the diagram shown below, the lower block is acted on by a force, F, which has a magnitude of 64.1 N. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the lower block and the surface is 0.346. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the lower block and the upper block is also 0.346. What is the acceleration of the lower block, if the mass of the lower block is 4.04 kg and the mass of the upper block is 1.86 kg?

http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/7450/knpic0828.png


Homework Equations


ΣF y = ma y

ΣF x = ma x


The Attempt at a Solution



So i set up 2 freebody diagrams, one for each object and I made F net equations. For the top block:

ma = T - μk*mg (1)

The friction comes from the friction between the top block and the bottom block.

and for the bottom it would be:

ma = Fa - Fk - T (2)

In this case the friction comes from the friction between the bottom block and the ground.


So in the second equation I solved for T, subbed it into equation 1 and solved for a, however I am not getting the correct answer. Any ideas?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What happened to the friction between the two blocks in your second equation?
 
How would I write the friction between the two blocks?

ma = Fa - Fk - T - Fk (?)

So would I get,

ma = F - μk* m1g - μk * m2g - T
 
Yes, I think that's correct.

m_2 a= F-(m_1+m_2)g\mu_k-T
 
Hey I still can't get it with that formula.. Can someone help?
 
Did you find the expression for a?
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top