Solving Friction Problems: Homework Statement & Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter LoveandHate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics homework problem involving a cat launched from a cannon across a frozen lake, focusing on friction and motion equations. Key points include calculating the normal force, kinetic friction, and acceleration to determine if the cat can cross the lake and its final speed. The initial calculations yield a significant distance, suggesting a possible error in assumptions about final velocity. Participants express confusion over applying the work-energy theorem and the relationship between forces and accelerations. The conversation highlights the challenges of understanding frictional forces and their impact on motion in this scenario.
LoveandHate
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 2.5 kg cat is fired horizontally out of a cannon across a frozen lake. It is wearing steel tap shoes. The kinetic coefficient of friction is 0.010. If the cat's initial speed was 200 km/h, then:
a) does the cat make it all the way across the 1.0 km wide lake?
b) if so, what is its final speed on the far side of the lake?
c) if the coefficient of kinetic friction between the steel and ground on the far side of the lake is 0.50000, how far does the cat slide?

Homework Equations


Fg=ma
Fk=\mukFN
FNET=ma
v22=v12+2a\Deltad


The Attempt at a Solution


a) I figured out FN by using Fg=ma and got 24.5 N [up]. I then used this to find Fk, which would equal FNET. For this value, I got 0.245 N [W]. Then I found acceleration using FNET=ma and got -0.098 m/s2. I subbed all of these numbers into the the last formula and got about 15749.56 m. I think I may have used the last formula wrong because I assumed what v2 is, but I needed to because I don't know what \Deltat is.

b) I assume that I will sub all of my calculations (the appropriate ones, of course) into the last formula and solve for v2?

c) I have no idea how to start this one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your notation is a bit messy... So with the normal force and gravitational force you have a different acceleration. One is due to the friction "a" and the other is due to gravity "g". So you should write Fg=my instead... No what did you assume for v2? Think about the work-energy theorem ;)
 
Thaakisfox said:
Your notation is a bit messy... So with the normal force and gravitational force you have a different acceleration. One is due to the friction "a" and the other is due to gravity "g". So you should write Fg=my instead... No what did you assume for v2? Think about the work-energy theorem ;)

we haven't learned that yet! and I'm confused by what you said.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top