Solving Gauss's Law Problem: Determine Electric Field on/in Sphere

  • Thread starter Thread starter samblue
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gauss's law Law
AI Thread Summary
Gauss's Law states that the electric flux through a closed surface is equal to the enclosed charge divided by the permittivity of free space. For a metallic sphere with a diameter of 2 cm and a charge of 2 nC, the electric field at the surface can be calculated using this law. Inside the conductor, the electric field is zero due to electrostatic equilibrium, meaning all charge resides on the surface. Therefore, the charge inside the sphere is effectively zero. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving problems related to electric fields and conductors.
samblue
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Ok so I', having some problems with Gauss's law. I know what it is, but I still can't get the answers right.

A metallic sphere of diameter 2*10-2m has been given a charge of 2 nC. State Gauss's law. Use this to determine the electrical field at the surface of the sphere. What is the electrical field inside the field?


Homework Equations



integral (E.dA)=Qenclosed/permitivity of free space


The Attempt at a Solution



the fist part is the equation written below.

However I am not sure about the next part. How do I distinguish between the charge inside the spehere and the charge on the surface?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming electrostatic equilibrium, what's the charge inside a conductor?
 
Doc Al said:
Assuming electrostatic equilibrium, what's the charge inside a conductor?


Not really sure. Is it zero? Becasue all of the charge passes through it?
 
samblue said:
Not really sure. Is it zero? Becasue all of the charge passes through it?
Key fact (where electrostatic equilibrium holds): The electric field is zero everwhere inside a conductor. All the (net) charge on a conductor lies on its surface.
 
thanks
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Use of imaginary charge vs Gauss' law
Replies
12
Views
894
Gauss' law problem -- Should the field due to both the inside and outside charges be taken into account?
Replies
28
Views
1K
I Thought I Understood Gauss' Law (Sheets)
Replies
26
Views
2K
No Electric Charges if No Electric Field in Region
Replies
22
Views
2K
Gauss' Law for a conducting / non-conducting sheet
Replies
5
Views
1K
Electric field at a point inside a non-uniformly charged sphere
Replies
6
Views
1K
Gauss' law and Faraday cage problem
Replies
10
Views
2K
Electric field external to Conducting Hollow Sphere with charge inside
Replies
23
Views
3K
Induced charge on a conducting sphere sliced by a plane
Replies
2
Views
1K
Electric field using Gauss' Law
Replies
3
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top