Solving Hammer Launch Problem: 32.8m

  • Thread starter Thread starter danago
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Launch
AI Thread Summary
An athlete swings a hammer in a tilted circle, releasing it at a height of 1.5m and an angle of 45 degrees with an initial speed of 18m/s. The calculations involve parametric equations for horizontal and vertical displacement, leading to a computed landing distance of 33.8m. However, the expected answer is 32.8m, prompting questions about potential errors in the calculations or a typo in the problem statement. Discrepancies in the hammer's speed based on the swing's radius and period suggest a possible inconsistency in the provided data. The discussion highlights the confusion around the velocity values and their impact on the final answer.
danago
Gold Member
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
4
An athlete starts to swing a hammer in a 2m radius circle which is tilted up on one side. Each complete 360 degree swing takes 0.71s. The angle of the plane of the circle to the horizontal is 45 degrees.

The hammer is released at a height of 1.5m from the ground, at an angle of 45 degrees to the horizontal, while traveling at 18m/s. How far away does it land, assuming g=10ms-2


I started by coming up with parametric equations, which give the vertical (y) and horizontal (x) displacement as a function of time (t).

<br /> x=18t sin(45)
y=18t cos(45) - 5t^2<br />

Since it was released from a heigh of 1.5m off the ground, the ground corrosponds to a displacement of -1.5m. So i set y=-1.5 and solved for t, giving t=2.658s. Then using this value in my 'x' equation, i get a horizontal displacement of 33.8m.

Now, i checked the answer, and apparently it is 32.8m. Have i done something wrong, or is the 2 in the answer a typo?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
danago, if i compute the speed of the hammer from the radius and period info, I get an answer that's a bit different than 18m/s but which more closely corresponds to the book answer. BTW, I believe you have sin and cos flipped in your eqns but since they are the same at 45 degrees, made no difference to the calculation.
 
Thanks for that :smile: I don't know why they would state a new velocity in the question though, since it contradicts the other given information.
 
Yea, its weird. IIRC it was like 17.7, maybe they rounded up, but then should have been consistent throughout
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top