Solving Hess's Law Problem for ΔH of Formation of Hematite

  • Thread starter Thread starter ice87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the enthalpy of formation for hematite (Fe2O3) at 1200K, the heat capacity function was integrated from 298K to 1200K, considering the different states of hematite. The resulting value of 129300 J/mol reflects the enthalpy change due to heating hematite, not the absolute enthalpy of formation. The enthalpy of formation at 298K, given as -821300 J/mol, should not be added to this value, as it represents a different process. The enthalpy of formation is defined as the change when forming the compound from its elements at standard states, which requires a separate calculation at 1200K. A review of Hess's Law is recommended to clarify these concepts.
ice87
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
So I'm taking Thermodynamics I in university. I'm just doing the homework now, and there is something that i don't really understand.

To get the Enthalpy of formation for hematite (Fe2O3) at 1200K, I first integrated the constant pressure heat capacity function over the temperature range from 298K to 1200K, then added the heats of transformation across this temperature range. but now, at the end, should the enthalpy of formation at 298K be added to the number that i found?

=> integrating over from 298K to 1200K, and adding the heat of transformation for hematite: I got this number: 129300J/mol

=> ΔH of formation at 298K is given as -821300J/mol, should i add these two numbers together?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You integrated the heat capacities of what from 298 - 1200? Hess's Law.
 
roughly speaking I integrated the C_p function of Fe2O3 - hematite from 298 to 1200.
I really integrated it three times, because hematite has 3 states in this temperature range, and the C_p function for each state is different.
 
Okay, that gives you the difference in enthalpy between hematite at 298 and 1200, right? Says nothing about absolute or standard enthalpy of formation of hematite at either temperature. Enthalpy of formation is defined as the enthalpy change when the compound is formed from the elements at their standard states at the same temperature. You are looking for the enthalpy of formation of hematite at 1200 K, the enthalpy change you would observe if you combined oxygen and iron to form hematite at 1200 K. What you have is the enthalpy change for heating hematite from 298 to 1200 and the enthalpy of formation of hematite at 298. Read the section on Hess's Law again.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top