Solving Horizontal Displacement of 3.6kg Pendulum

  • Thread starter Thread starter Format
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum
AI Thread Summary
To solve for the horizontal displacement of a 3.6 kg pendulum struck by a 0.018 kg bullet, conservation of momentum is applied to find the combined velocity after the collision, resulting in 1.144 m/s. Following this, conservation of energy is used to determine the height the pendulum reaches after the collision, yielding a height of 0.105 m. The horizontal displacement can then be calculated using the Pythagorean theorem, leading to a displacement of approximately 2.7 m. However, discrepancies in the calculations suggest a potential error in the initial speed used, which should be corrected to 1.144 m/s. The final answer for horizontal displacement may differ from expected values due to these calculation errors.
Format
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
How would you solve for the horizontal displacement of a 3.6 kg pendulum that hangs from a string 2.8 meters high, which is shot (and embeded) by a 0.018 kg bullet traveling at a velocity of 230 m/s?

I solved for the velocity of the objects together...
mv + mv = mv + mv
18(230) + 3.6(0) = 21.6v
v = 191.7 m/s

If the pendulum swings upward, how do i solve for the horizontal displacement?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Format said:
How would you solve for the horizontal displacement of a 3.6 kg pendulum that hangs from a string 2.8 meters high, which is shot (and embeded) by a 0.018 kg bullet traveling at a velocity of 230 m/s?
Solve it in two steps:
(1) Apply conservation of momentum for the collision
(2) Apply conservation of energy after the collision to see how high it swings. (Then use trig to find the horizontal displacement.)

I solved for the velocity of the objects together...
mv + mv = mv + mv
18(230) + 3.6(0) = 21.6v
v = 191.7 m/s
Huh? Conservation of momentum: m_1v_1 + m_2v_2 = (m_1 + m_2)v_f
 
k ill give that a try, thx.

And the 21.6 is just the 2 masses added, didnt show all my work lol.


Edit: Well there's the problem lol...i put 18-g not 0.018-kg. I got it, thx
 
Last edited:
K, well i lied...i thought i had it but i didnt lol. Can someone help a bit further with this?
 
Initially, the bullet and pendulum have some momentum (the pendulums happens to be zero). Because of conservation of momentum, the momentum of the pendulum and bullet combination will be the same as the initial momentum of the bullet. That way you can get your velocity for the pendulum+bullet.

Next, mechanical energy must be conserved after that. So find your initial kinetic energy. The bob will keep going until all the kinetic energy has been converted into potential energy. See if you can take it from there.
 
K well this is what I've got...

mv + mv = v(m + m)
0.018(230) + 3.6(0) = v(3.618)
v = 1.144 m/s <-- This is the velocity of both the objects together


Then i did...

1/2mv² + mgh = 1/2mv² + mgh <-- masses cancel out
1/2(1.44)² + 0 = 0 + (9.8)h <-- h=0 initially and v=0 at top
h = 0.105 m

Im guessin there is something wrong with this part...
 
Last edited:
Format said:
K well this is what I've got...

mv + mv = v(m + m)
0.018(230) + 3.6(0) = v(3.618)
v = 1.144 m/s <-- This is the velocity of both the objects together


Then i did...

1/2mv² + mgh = 1/2mv² + mgh <-- masses cancel out
1/2(1.44)² + 0 = 0 + (9.8)h <-- h=0 initially and v=0 at top
h = 0.105 m

Im guessin there is something wrong with this part...
that looks right
you can figure out the x displacement with pythagorean theorem, maybe drawing a diagram it will help
 
I did that, but it doesn't give me the correct answer

2.8² - 0.105² = x²

x = 2.7

The answer says 0.61...maybe it was a typo, but that's pretty far off.
 
Typo: wrong speed

Format said:
1/2mv² + mgh = 1/2mv² + mgh <-- masses cancel out
1/2(1.44)² + 0 = 0 + (9.8)h <-- h=0 initially and v=0 at top
h = 0.105 m

Im guessin there is something wrong with this part...
You plugged in the wrong speed. You used 1.44 instead of 1.144.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
21K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Back
Top